Ok, on auto-settlers 1 against 3 for. A couple more fors and we'll add it.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RAH rules: The Neverending Saga
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Well, don't I feel stupid.
The only reason I tried it was for one of those Gold based cities that had a lot of plains around it. There was no immediate water near and I would have had to irrigate a couple of desert squares to bring the water close enough. I had built a bunch of settlers to expand by that city only to find that all the land nearby had already been claimed. As I immediately switched production to cats to "settle" that territory, I had a settler that was just standing around so I tried it.
So I guess it really was boredom.
RAHIt's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
I only destroyed one city before we lost you. More would have fallen, especially since he still wasn't researching math.
But the Final result for HH was already written. Kudos to him for losing his capital and still fighting on despite the inevitable. Most people would have quit. He showed some class.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah
Most people would have quit. He showed some class.
even so, you need a bunch b/c people are bringing a ton of units with them...
hehe early republicBoston Red Sox are 2004 World Series Champions!
Comment
-
yeah, i went back to this classic to honor the release of MoO3
also, update made re: wonders and tech thingyLast edited by ColdWizard; February 12, 2003, 17:37.
Comment
Comment