Someone please shut Markus up

[War4ever]

they are ugly maps though

[deity]

I just did!

I'll post about it soon but in the Thurs night diplo I repulsed all Markus invasions despite Dangime, Raz and Winzity ALL attacking me or declaring war on me!

J23SE and Berzerker the only two in the game not against me and I only lost two small homeland cities. Dangime has retreated now. Markus can't capture anything...

You'll have trouble shutting me up now.. more later...

[War4ever]

Originally posted by deity
I just did!

. Markus can't capture anything...

You'll have trouble shutting me up now.. more later...

ROTFLMAO....well done......

[Ming]

Originally posted by deity
You'll have trouble shutting me up now.. more later...

Gee... from the way he was talking, you were dead meat... I guess not.

[deity]

Originally posted by Ming


Gee... from the way he was talking, you were dead meat... I guess not.

That's just it! He TALKS!

"mumble mumble .. super trade god.. mumble mumble... "

LOL

[Alexander's Horse]

Originally posted by War4ever
they are ugly maps though

Sometimes - but only if you choose small map. That seems to squeeze out the green squares.

If you make the parameters slightly larger than small you get quite a good map.

[markusf]

Originally posted by deity
I just did!

I'll post about it soon but in the Thurs night diplo I repulsed all Markus invasions despite Dangime, Raz and Winzity ALL attacking me or declaring war on me!

J23SE and Berzerker the only two in the game not against me and I only lost two small homeland cities. Dangime has retreated now. Markus can't capture anything...

You'll have trouble shutting me up now.. more later...

We played 3 turns or 4 turns, and i landed 3 consripts on a forest because i couldn't land elsewhere. How exactly does one invade without attacking a single unit or city?

Winzity has no offensive units and no ships and hasn't attacked you once.

dagmine has a few muskets and took a empty city.

As for raz attacking you? Come on how stupid do you think i am, its just another way for you to get around the rules, he takes a few cities and puts in very light defence, then you attack them and get his war techs. ( we banned contact of any kind except trading maps + no tech stealing)


So let me get this straight, last week you tried to convince everyone your allowed to attack by asking other civs to make you declare war. I then reposted the rules, where we all agreed and then YOU yes YOU sent around a message saying i forgot to add unit gifting and gifting of gold was also banned.

This session, you invite raz to take over the for the romans, i tell him the rules and all of a sudden you remember nothing about gifting of units being against the rules, you even send around a message telling everyone its ok. I forward you the message you sent to everyone last week telling them it was banned. you then send a message telling everyone you won't do it because you don't want me whining about it. So basically, you wanted ras to join and take over for the AI so he could gift you units, when that didn't work you got him to "declare" war on you and take a few of your size 3 cities.

I also said i might get a job next week so my playing time would be pushed back to at least 6pst just like it was before feb. You try and make it sound like i was quitting.

Basically you pull the exact same bull**** every time your not winning, this time i was smart enough to make sure the rules where ALL spelled out before the game, and they appear in all players icq history.

[Alexander's Horse]

I really don't know why they call them "diplo" games

[deity]

You know perfectly well that I wasn't sure. I was entirely happy with any decision.
You spread falsities Markus.

Raz is a wildcard and I had NO idea he was going to attack. I'm Macheavellian in the game but outside I don't set things up like that because everyone knows I'm a very fair player.

I let a lot of things go in the interests of keeping games going. Your rep is in tatters and you are trying to deflect.

You kept track of the agreed rules and I'm thankfull for that. I never argued about it and simply asked a few questions about rules when I wasn't sure. Last week you sent around my original rules that were posted that said unit ceding was OK, provided there were no double moves. Today you qualified that by saying that subsequently we agreed to no gifting of anything. I went along with that even though I wasn't sure. But upon reflection that does ring a bell. I'll have to go back over the thread. stop trying make up things though.

Losers always talk rules hair splitting when things aren't going so well.

[deity]

June7, Markus sent this around last week quoting my originally posted rules:

Settings and Rules:

Customise World: Normal 50x80 Map, normal landmass, varied terrain, wet, cool, 4 billion yrs, Deity level, 7 civs, Roving Bands, Std Rules
1x1x
ONE Wonder per civ
NO Alliances
NO Tech trading
ONLY capture one undefended city per turn pre-1000BC (per civ)
ONLY capture 3 cities per turn per civ thereafter
Ceding units OK, BUT NO double moves
No City bribe
Unit bribe OK
All tricks acceptable in Rah Rules are OK - like IRB is OK, etc
All the cheats not accepted in Rah rules NOT OK - NO caraporting, etc
You can't ask another civ to go to war on someone else to avoid revolution

[Alexander's Horse]

Originally posted by deity

Raz is a wildcard

In every game he plays

[Hydey]

This is even better than the EYES- STRAT threads because you guys actually play civ games

[War4ever]

lots of controversy this civ game.....it really is realistic isn't it

[Alexander's Horse]

Its threads like this which confirm my view that I don't want to play diplo

Its just seems to be one big catfight after another.

[deity]

Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
Its threads like this which confirm my view that I don't want to play diplo

Its just seems to be one big catfight after another.

That's the fun, but they are not really diplos any more in the classic sense.