Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lighthouse.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Oh, and what's this about wanting to test something out on the zone? Are you full of **** or what?

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by rah
      In three attacks, anything is possible, I've seen weirder many times. Still isn't strong enough. Without the prior saves, there's not much to be proved. And I assumed by now someone else would have reported building a non-vet after LH, but I guess it hasn't been long enough. Maybe you should post it in the strat section to see if any of the SPers have experienced it.

      Rich

      Heck saturday Epik sent vet crusaders against my vet phal fortified on river forest. He attacked two or three times and lost everytime. The next turn I sent my vet crusaders against his vet phal fortified on river forest. Killed three of them and then the subsequent elephants without losing an attacker. Go figure. S**T happens. Not enough attacks for probability to even out.
      haha... well trust me i know math, and if its truely random, then the chance of 3 vet ships winning in a row is 1/1000
      Join the army, travel to foreign countries, meet exotic people -
      and kill them!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by markusf


        haha... well trust me i know math, and if its truely random, then the chance of 3 vet ships winning in a row is 1/1000

        Is that "New Math"?


        RAH

        I did just try to download that zip file and it said not found.
        It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
        RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #34
          downloads fine, its a zip file.
          Join the army, travel to foreign countries, meet exotic people -
          and kill them!

          Comment


          • #35
            Must be my netscape settings, I'll try it from work
            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • #36
              Yep, it must have been the settings, I tried it from work using ie and had no problem. I'll bring it home and check it latter.

              RAH
              It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
              RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by markusf


                haha... well trust me i know math, and if its truely random, then the chance of 3 vet ships winning in a row is 1/1000
                Markus, I tried to make some calculations (attacker 1.5 defender 1) and I've got these results:
                Vet wins (on 4 attacks) - % probability
                4 - 13%
                3 - 34.5%
                2 - 34.5%
                1 - 15%
                0 - 3%


                Did I miss anything? (but I've never had a deep analisys of the combat system)
                And the results are conforting... not 1/1000 prob but 3%... I know... but it happens...
                googol... this is a number!
                "Silence Ming. I will let you know when I feel you are needed." - HappySunShine
                "Classic Eyes...But in reality, it works the other way around." - Ming

                Comment


                • #38
                  Hmmm, why did you calculate it on 4 attacks when markus said 3 ships? I must have missed something.
                  It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                  RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by rah
                    Hmmm, why did you calculate it on 4 attacks when markus said 3 ships? I must have missed something.


                    Did I miss anything? (but I've never had a deep analisys of the combat system)

                    ... apparently I did .

                    Here are my results on 3 attacks:
                    Vet win - %
                    3 - 22%
                    2 - 43%
                    1 - 29%
                    0 - 6%
                    googol... this is a number!
                    "Silence Ming. I will let you know when I feel you are needed." - HappySunShine
                    "Classic Eyes...But in reality, it works the other way around." - Ming

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Messer Niccolò


                      Markus, I tried to make some calculations (attacker 1.5 defender 1) and I've got these results:
                      Vet wins (on 4 attacks) - % probability
                      4 - 13%
                      3 - 34.5%
                      2 - 34.5%
                      1 - 15%
                      0 - 3%


                      Did I miss anything? (but I've never had a deep analisys of the combat system)
                      And the results are conforting... not 1/1000 prob but 3%... I know... but it happens...
                      Well i think that 1.5 vs 1 is bs.. Go into cheat mode, create 20 vet ships vs 20 non vets. Your chance of winning is about 2 in 20. Using the combination formula you can then predict what your chances are of winning 2 in a row, followed by 3 in a row. If the chance of winning is truely random. This is the probability of 3 distinct vet ships losing to 3 non vet ships. Imagine having a deck of 10 cards, 3 non vet ships winning a battle, is the same probability as you picking the ace of spades 3 times in a row from the deck

                      (2) 1/10* 1/10 = 1/100
                      (3) 1/10 * 1/10 *1/10 = 1/1000
                      Join the army, travel to foreign countries, meet exotic people -
                      and kill them!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X