Smash, agreed. It didn't deserve what it got. But then whenever Eyes is involved, things get blown out of proportion pretty quick around here. Mine and Ming's games were never put to that type of scrutiny. (we didn't care, of course, we did it just to irritate each other, which we're quite good at)
And I did just post something about it
I was interested to see what other's thought. And figured that it was about time I did.
Actually since he took it to the extreme, we've never seen quite that starvation factor, but it does extrapolate out from what we experienced. I didn't study it in detail because I knew it was possible. Xin predicted some of the theoretical highs, which were close to what ming and I estimated. This game fell well within that limit. Higher is possible, but I'd shoot myself first.
RAH
And I did just post something about it

I was interested to see what other's thought. And figured that it was about time I did.
Actually since he took it to the extreme, we've never seen quite that starvation factor, but it does extrapolate out from what we experienced. I didn't study it in detail because I knew it was possible. Xin predicted some of the theoretical highs, which were close to what ming and I estimated. This game fell well within that limit. Higher is possible, but I'd shoot myself first.
RAH
The map I used was just a large random map produced by the game, not one like this guy used to produce the game in "question", but his score would still make any attempt by me look ridiculous. It truly was a pain to play that game so it does take a special constitution to play these sp games for high score.
I guess that makes you 0-3
Comment