The MP games that I have played that included an AI have all be a mess. In my opinion the Artifical Ignorance is a bad player.
1. It bribes cities (violating an agreed upon rule)
2. It violates agreements amoung players, such as borders.
3. It will change a city's priority to food and population, when a leader would have gone for production and trade.
4. It will change a wonder being built. (I have seen the AI change from a valuable wonder like Leo's Workshop to a weak one like the Oracle).
5. An AI can give away tech advances that a player would not. It can also be cowed into paying tribute.
For these reasons, I do not care to play an MP game with an AI. If a player cannot make a session, then we have tried to find a substitute. With the aid of the diplo posts, a sub can get the feel for a leaders goals. If we cannot find a sub then my opinion is that the game be postponed.
I am not concerned how long the game will take to complete, when I started this game I figured it might take a few months to complete.
1. It bribes cities (violating an agreed upon rule)
2. It violates agreements amoung players, such as borders.
3. It will change a city's priority to food and population, when a leader would have gone for production and trade.
4. It will change a wonder being built. (I have seen the AI change from a valuable wonder like Leo's Workshop to a weak one like the Oracle).
5. An AI can give away tech advances that a player would not. It can also be cowed into paying tribute.
For these reasons, I do not care to play an MP game with an AI. If a player cannot make a session, then we have tried to find a substitute. With the aid of the diplo posts, a sub can get the feel for a leaders goals. If we cannot find a sub then my opinion is that the game be postponed.
I am not concerned how long the game will take to complete, when I started this game I figured it might take a few months to complete.
Comment