Just a question.
I had a minor dispute against the poor celts whan one of my subs "accidentally" sank one of their transport - you know sometimes it happens when torpedoes hit - well, they declared war .
So I sent a couple of crusier to teach the "steel way" to one of their cities.
This city was surrounded by barbs in fortress (musket+cannon) and I wondered if, in case of an empty city, the "raging" barbs would take the opportunity sack and settle.
With much disappointmen I only saw the barbs "raging" in the fortress not taking the empty city (for 3 turns).
Is this the usual raging approach?
I had a minor dispute against the poor celts whan one of my subs "accidentally" sank one of their transport - you know sometimes it happens when torpedoes hit - well, they declared war .
So I sent a couple of crusier to teach the "steel way" to one of their cities.
This city was surrounded by barbs in fortress (musket+cannon) and I wondered if, in case of an empty city, the "raging" barbs would take the opportunity sack and settle.
With much disappointmen I only saw the barbs "raging" in the fortress not taking the empty city (for 3 turns).
Is this the usual raging approach?
Comment