TOP Civ2 FILES FOR DECEMBER

[MarkG]

25,000 Downloads for the month of December in our civ2 database)in comparison to 16,000 in November and 20,000 in October
60 New reviews, exactly the same number with December. As for the Top 10, there several changes and two newcomers in the last two positions. Here is the full thing

<u>Top 10 Files</u>
1(1). 10.00(10.00) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=484">Techtree</a>
2(2). 9.90(9.86) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=213">Lord of the Rings</a>
3(4). 9.75(9.67) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=420">Colonies III</a>
4(3). 9.67(9.67) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=191">Patch for Civilization II (2.42)</a>
5(5). 9.56(9.60) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=224">HiRes</A>
6(8). 9.33(9.33) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=1">Australia</A>
7(6). 9.33(9.60) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=269">Rip-off units pack</A>
8(10). 9.33(9.33) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=410">Day of Treason</A>
9(-). 9.33(-) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=466">Maps of Complexity</A>
10(-). 9.25(-) <A href="http://apolyton.net/cgi-bin/civ2/db/review.cgi?ID=360">The War of Cuba</A>

<u>Database Stats</u>
Total Files: 463 (463)
Total Reviews: 263 (203)
Total Rated Files: 111 (104)
Average Rating: 7.22 (7.33)
Total Downloads: 153762 (138366)
Average Downloads/File: 332.1 (298.85)

As of today, there is going to be a change in the system, and one will have to use his forum username and password in order to review a file. This way we will have more creditable reviews and votes.

[Sieve Too]

Any chance of allowing a user to edit their review after it's been submitted? I'm the guy responsible for Harlan's awesome LOTR scenario to be perpetually stuck in 2nd place since I gave it a 9 instead of a 10. I've been meaning to say why I didn't give it a 10 despite all the gushing I did over it!

For the record, the only reason I didn't give it a 10 was because of the README file. It gives incorrect unit stats for almost every enemy unit. It makes them seem weaker than they actually are, causing me to blow my first two attempts at the scenario by my sending expensive units on what turned out to be suicide attacks.

[MarkG]

unfortunately, right now allowing a user to edit his review is not doable

[Sten Sture]

Thanks Markos!! (& DanQ)

Keep up the great work!
[This message has been edited by Sten Sture (edited January 20, 2001).]