Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Commerce Poll (PLEASE READ DEBRIEFING FIRST)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Commerce Poll (PLEASE READ DEBRIEFING FIRST)

    Alright, here's the debriefing:

    We are building caravans in the following cities:
    Sodaq- Spice, Pearls, Salt
    Apolyton- Silk, Furs
    Walvis Baii- Pearls, Gems, Furs

    We can trade with nearby Rome for some quick profit, they seem to be peaceful and small and after the containment city is founded it'll be easy to maintain the peace. There is a trireme nearby that seems to be about to turn into a taxi as a poll suggests.

    Rome demands:
    Rome- Silk, Copper, Silver
    Antium- Dye, Copper, Silk
    Cumae- Silk, Wool, Gems
    Veii- Dye, Copper, Pearls

    On the other hand, we have faraway Egypt. There's a trireme lying idle around Egypt that can be used to transport two caravans, though this will take longer, it should net us some more cash (although I don't expect it to be very much more).

    Egypt demand:
    Thebes- Furs, Wine, Silk
    Elephantine- Furs, Gold, Silver
    Heliopolis- Dye, Copper, Pearls
    Memphis- Dye, Wine, Furs

    We can produce demanded commodities in both empires in each of the three cities making units. I personally suggest we go for trade with Rome. They may be closer, it'll net us some less money individually, but it won't be so disruptive to the movement of triremes. As well as the fact, that I'm pretty sure that trireme sulking at the loss of our warrior north of Egypt will be used for colonisation rather than commerce in the nearby future.

    Overall, we have those two options or the isolationist, you decide.
    15
    Trade with Rome- Yes, they're small, cute, nearby and we should make some immediate money without upsetting the usage of triremes too much.
    80.00%
    12
    Trade with Egypt- Yes, they're far away, and they won't bother us for a while, and we'll net more money.
    13.33%
    2
    Do internal trade- Close the borders! Expel the foreign devils! Glory to bakufu!
    6.67%
    1

    The poll is expired.


  • #2
    It appears that our main plan involves eliminating India and then Rome. If that is the case, there is not enough gain to be had by trade with cities that may soon be destroyed.

    It will be worth more to establish trade (if we do that at all with other civs) with those destined to survive longer.

    Actually, the best thing is to establish trade routes with our own cities on other landmasses. That way, we don't have to share the wealth with anyone.
    Civ2 Demo Game #1 City-Planner, President, Historian
    Civ2 Demo Game #2 Minister of War,President, Minister of Trade, Vice President, City-Planner
    Civ2 Demo Game #3 President, Minister of War, President
    Civ2 Demo Game #4 Despot, City-Planner, Consul

    Comment


    • #3
      I dunno....

      We should perhaps look for the quick benefit - and if Rome really is peaceful, perhaps it is best to consider using it as a useful trading partner until we are dominant enough that we no longer need them.

      I don't know IIRC, but don't things like trade have an effect on the Civ's attitude? India seems to have all the hallmarks of Hostile Nation #1 at the mo', and I don't believe we are quite at the stage of killing them and moving on to someone else YET.

      So, all in all, let the swine (Romans) have their pearls! We need the gold, and perhaps that will allow us to adjust taxes to curb those unhappy mutterings disturbing our President so.
      Consul.

      Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!

      Comment


      • #4
        Trade with Rome after containing them.

        That aside... pearls? I don't remember that being a trade commodity... *scratches head*
        oh god how did this get here I am not good with livejournal

        Comment


        • #5
          Another advantage to trading with the Romans is that soon those cities will be ours!


          Where the heck did we find Pearls????????
          Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
          RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms

          Comment


          • #6
            Trade with Rome:
            advantages:
            -Close
            -quick profit
            -easy to contain as "other empire to trade with"(we keep them contained(=NOT KILL THEM) and get big profits=> kill rest of the world...since they(Rome) are pathetic we don't need to be that affraid of them))
            -keep triremes near.

            Shade
            ex-president of Apolytonia former King of the Apolytonian Imperium
            "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
            shameless plug to my site:home of Civ:Imperia(WIP)

            Comment


            • #7
              Blame El Awrence for the Pearls, I just followed his lead...

              Maybe there are Pearls in the MGE game?
              Consul.

              Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!

              Comment


              • #8
                I never see pearls, perhaps its a cheat.
                The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits

                Hydey the no-limits man.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It sounds as tho someone has an altered rules.txt... One wonders what else has been altered besides just the trade commodities?

                  If it's just a commodity, no big deal. It will revert back to whatever the default is when the next president plays.
                  The first President of the first Apolyton Democracy Game (CivII, that is)

                  The gift of speech is given to many,
                  intelligence to few.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Are there Pearls ?

                    I try an explanation :
                    Don't blame latin players : in Civ II, there are Gems for trade.
                    But the translation in other languages may be not very acute.
                    In french, for instance, gems become "joyaux", that may be translate approximatively by Pears !
                    And in castellano (spanish...)...
                    JCP
                    Paris, FRANCE

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Are there Pearls ?

                      Originally posted by JCP
                      ...translate approximatively by Pears !
                      Pearls, of course !
                      JCP
                      Paris, FRANCE

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Mais, bien sur!
                        Consul.

                        Back to the ROOTS of addiction. My first missed poll!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X