accelarated or normal start?

[Shaka Naldur]

do we play with accerlaret setup or with normal start??

if we use the normal one the begining will be very boring, but with an accerlarated setup we´ll have a lot of things to do from the start

[Vlad Antlerkov]

Normal.

We all know how badly the AI manages itself. Don't want it managing our civ...

[Gramphos]

Of cource we should play normal. We are going to build the civ from 4000 BC.

[Scouse Gits]

Gramphos said it all ...

[shade]

Or we could do as I proposed before:
"Let the first president be TIRAN for 20(or how many turns are an accelerated startup)turns and then start."
It has 2 pro's
-->there is something to do from the moment our turns kick in(btw the first 20 turns in a civgame take how long??20 minutes while in the endgame it already takes sometimes 1 hour just to get to the next turn)
-->the quality of the brain of our president will most probably be a little better than that of the AI.

Shade

[Relegin Bor]

Re: accelarated or normal start?

Originally posted by Shaka Naldur
do we play with accerlaret setup or with normal start??

if we use the normal one the begining will be very boring, but with an accerlarated setup we´ll have a lot of things to do from the start

Boring?! The first few millenia of exploration is the best part! Micro-managing is the boring bit!

Shaka, maybe someone else should be El Presidente in the initial phases?

I like Shade's idea, but with some initial guiding principles from the prols.

Cheers,

Relegin Bor

[Shaka Naldur]

Re: Re: accelarated or normal start?

Originally posted by Relegin Bor


Shaka, maybe someone else should be El Presidente in the initial phases?

I think the same

[Marcel I]

the quality of the brain of our president will most probably be a little better than that of the AI

We certainly may hope so