Tweet
Actually the last time I tried to post two in a row. (splitting a long article into two posts because of it's size) I was too quick and the flood control got it. I had to wait to post the second one.
-
Actually the last time I tried to post two in a row. (splitting a long article into two posts because of it's size) I was too quick and the flood control got it. I had to wait to post the second one.
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O -
The problem with automating the combination of 5 posts into 1 is that computers don't understand context. For example, H Tower's thread by necessity needs more than 1 post. The 5 posts in the original link is a more likely candidate to be spam.
The good thing is we have mods who can make this type of decision.I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).Comment
-
Besides, if you make those 5 posts into 1 posts, the spamsharks would be upset....
ACK!
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!Comment
-
very upset
Comment
-
Creating large numbers of emergency DL's to flood the Community forum with dozens of "I'd-know--the-answer-to-this-dumbass-question-if-only-I-was-smart-enough-to-look-in-the-FAQ" threads and then all simultaneously responding to them and dragging them wildly off-topic would solve the problem.Originally posted by Tuberski
Besides, if you make those 5 posts into 1 posts, the spamsharks would be upset....If I'm posting here then Counterglow must be down.Comment
-
I think you just called Six Thousand Year Old Man a DL.Originally posted by FrustratedPoet
Creating large numbers of emergency DL's to flood the Community forum with dozens of "I'd-know--the-answer-to-this-dumbass-question-if-only-I-was-smart-enough-to-look-in-the-FAQ" threads and then all simultaneously responding to them and dragging them wildly off-topic would solve the problem.
I'm building a wagon! On some other part of the internets, obviously (but not that other site).Comment
-
He's an old DL.One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
curse your ugly brown eyes... so huge in their ugliness.Originally posted by ixnay
It doesn't really matter who has posted however many times unless they have a really annoying avatar.
yout goatee needs more play. i almost missed it."I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
- Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott CardComment
-
I thought this would be another slam at my posting methods 
. I do this a lot sometimes.
Because if I just edit my original post no one will see what I put in there. Many people just read a post once and never look at it again.Comment
-
Dis, don't be so self-conscious.
One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.Comment
-
I don't think I can.Comment
-
Hey Dissident, we're all ony human. If you noticed in our Diplo Game forum, I do the same thing (2-3) posts in a row - mainly to focus of different points of the subject...or just to rammble-on to myself and sort ideas out. 
____________________________
"One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
"If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
____________________________Comment
-
Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
Are you talking about introducing branching threads?
Comment
-
yeah I know.
Like I said I only do it because I have thoughts lader on I want to add on. but Sometimes these thoughts are minutes after the original post. I just want to make sure they are noticed.Comment
-
There is nothing wrong with 2 or even 3 posts in the right circumstances.......that's why it's allowed. Do it without good reason enough times and I'm sure it'll get spotted though.
Comment
Comment