I just headed over to the Simgolf website to get the patch, and what do I find in the forums but a post from Sid himself.
Yep, that's right, he's there, asking questions about what people want in a patch and generally showing interest in hearing fans' ideas. I still like Civ 3, but I'm sort of disappointed that while it seems so rushed and unpolished, Sid himself is asking fans for ideas regarding the SECOND patch for Simgolf. Uh-huh, he's talking about the second patch personally, (Simgolf is unpolished too, but more fun than Civ 3 so far) while we get no word about Civ.
I've seen a few people comment that Civ 3 is messed up because Sid was way more interested in Simgolf than Civ, heh, guess they were right. I used to chuckle at those people, now I have to chuckle at myself
I guess it's not a huge deal, but it is very disheartening.
I'll paste the post here for the morbidly curious, so you don't have to register and dig the SG forums...
__________________________________________________ __
Author: MaxisSid
Date: Feb-01-02 05:13 PM PST
Subject: Thanks, ideas for next patch, and question.
Wow, you guys certainly have a lot of well thought out suggestions for the game - I'm having
a hard time keeping up! I think this weekend we'll start to put together a patch which will
include the most-requested and easiest to implement improvements to the game. If you've
already posted your ideas on this BBS there's no need to post again, we'll review all the posts
as we put the patch together. Please understand that we can't include every great idea. We'll
definately change the 50 year retirement so that you can keep playing normally - perhaps
without updates to the Top 10 Designers screen. I'm guessing this should take about 7-10 days
plus testing time.
Question: In the demo the '+' gave you 10,000 extra simoleans, in the final game we took this out.
Should we...
1) leave it the way it is, no cheating.
2) restore the '+' key, cheating is an accepted part of golf! (I'll hear about that one)
3) allow the '+', but flag the game so that you can tell a cheat was used.
- Sid
__________________________________________________ __
Yep, that's right, he's there, asking questions about what people want in a patch and generally showing interest in hearing fans' ideas. I still like Civ 3, but I'm sort of disappointed that while it seems so rushed and unpolished, Sid himself is asking fans for ideas regarding the SECOND patch for Simgolf. Uh-huh, he's talking about the second patch personally, (Simgolf is unpolished too, but more fun than Civ 3 so far) while we get no word about Civ.
I've seen a few people comment that Civ 3 is messed up because Sid was way more interested in Simgolf than Civ, heh, guess they were right. I used to chuckle at those people, now I have to chuckle at myself
I guess it's not a huge deal, but it is very disheartening.
I'll paste the post here for the morbidly curious, so you don't have to register and dig the SG forums...
__________________________________________________ __
Author: MaxisSid
Date: Feb-01-02 05:13 PM PST
Subject: Thanks, ideas for next patch, and question.
Wow, you guys certainly have a lot of well thought out suggestions for the game - I'm having
a hard time keeping up! I think this weekend we'll start to put together a patch which will
include the most-requested and easiest to implement improvements to the game. If you've
already posted your ideas on this BBS there's no need to post again, we'll review all the posts
as we put the patch together. Please understand that we can't include every great idea. We'll
definately change the 50 year retirement so that you can keep playing normally - perhaps
without updates to the Top 10 Designers screen. I'm guessing this should take about 7-10 days
plus testing time.
Question: In the demo the '+' gave you 10,000 extra simoleans, in the final game we took this out.
Should we...
1) leave it the way it is, no cheating.
2) restore the '+' key, cheating is an accepted part of golf! (I'll hear about that one)
3) allow the '+', but flag the game so that you can tell a cheat was used.
- Sid
__________________________________________________ __
Comment