Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civ3 loses out to EU2 and Empire Earth in pc.ign's Strategy Game of the Year

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Civ3 loses out to EU2 and Empire Earth in pc.ign's Strategy Game of the Year

    here is the link



    pc.ign voted in EU2 with Empire Earth being the runner up
    the fans voted in Empire Earth with Civ3 being the runner up

  • #2

    Comment


    • #3
      well i dont know about eu2 vs civ3, but for the reader's choice, i have this feeling that rts fans are more than tbs....

      btw, on CGO(CGM), Empire Earth is not even in the nominees(for best strategy and best rts)
      Co-Founder, Apolyton Civilization Site
      Co-Owner/Webmaster, Top40-Charts.com | CTO, Apogee Information Systems
      giannopoulos.info: my non-mobile non-photo news & articles blog

      Comment


      • #4
        While I agree with their decision, I still have no idea why IGN insists on calling EU a turn based strategy game.
        "Let us kill the English! Their concept of individual rights could undermine the power of our beloved tyrants!"

        ~Lisa as Jeanne d'Arc

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Kyle
          I still have no idea why IGN insists on calling EU a turn based strategy game.
          I don't know if it fits into any other category. Maybe RTS but its not played like an RTS and doesn't appeal to the traditional RTS crowd. The general feel of EU2 is that of a TBS game.
          I don't do drugs anymore 'cause i find i can get the same effect by standing up really fast.

          I live in my own little world, but its ok; they know me here.

          Comment


          • #6
            EU II is the only actual RTS (real time strategy) out there. Most RTSs are actually RTTs (real time tactical).
            Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

            Comment


            • #7
              While I think EU2 is better than Civ3, can anyone really take IGN's position seriously when they call EU2 a TBS? Any idiot, playing 5 seconds of the game will realize it is a real time game! Jeez!
              “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
              - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

              Comment


              • #8
                There are enough gaming websites and magazines there that most of the "hot" games will be voted the best one way or another.

                I think they should just create a new category called "slugfest." That's what most of the so called "RTS" are.
                (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                Comment


                • #9
                  EU2- A real time game with pauses.
                  I think that is what makes it a TBS
                  -->Visit CGN!
                  -->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by chegitz guevara
                    EU II is the only actual RTS (real time strategy) out there. Most RTSs are actually RTTs (real time tactical).
                    Check out shogun-total war

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Wait a minute! Empire Earth isn't a TBS either, so why should it be in the same category as Civ 3?

                      IMHO, if the past two years are any indication, strategy gaming, particularily TBS gaming, is dead.
                      "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DrSpike
                        Check out shogun-total war
                        The combat portion is TBS, which takes up most of the playing time.
                        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          No, the combat resolution is real time, the training, building and moving of units is TB. Maybe it is a little unclear. My point was the RTS element (ie the one that is also MP) is very strategic, much more so than the usual RTS games. For the strategy gamer wishing to play MP there are few options outside of RTT (I like the term) games. Obviously MP SMAC or civ2 is best, but hard to arrange sometimes and very time consuming. Shogun is a good choice IMO. Games are between 10-30 minutes, and as I said, very challenging

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Well, Strangelove, remember, only 1 or 2 TBS games were released, they HAD to put civ in the category to be fair
                            -->Visit CGN!
                            -->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think they're both excellent games...but I don't compare them because they both play so differently
                              Talent Optional

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X