Complaint About Saddam

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Big Crunch


no-one should be banned solely for their posts stupid and ignorant nature. Hence my orignal post.

I agree completely.

[Wiglaf]

Hmm...

Congrats, infatuation. You've managed to dodge every question relating to your arguement. You made the claim that someone deserved to be banned due to injustice, yet cannot present any evidence of it. Great...

[Lefty Scaevola]

Infatuation is busy over the the OT deriding women posters and whining about the attention and chivalrous treatment that they (and not he) receive.

[Dauphin]

You are the biggest ****in **** talker I have ever met on any forum

Saying somthing at first, then re-defining it as something else. Please get your prioritys straight man.





I stand by what I said. The original post is supposed to convey the message that ignorance is more damning on a person than banning is, hence "ignorance is more damning than any banning can inflict"

So how have I "redefined" that statement?

[Dauphin]

Some people think ignorance is bliss though.

[Lefty Scaevola]

Originally posted by Big Crunch
Some people think ignorance is bliss though.

What fools. At best, ignorance is temporary avoidance of mental anguish then paid for by a greater harm when the problem is later discovered.

[Wiglaf]

Big Crunch..

So how have I "redefined" that statement?

Most people who read your post would think you meant saddam was being ignorant in saying Diana was unimportant. I'm still not sure if that's what you personally think, but it seems like a very questionable.. clarification.

I think we should just give up on infatuation. He's cutting off links to this thread he posted, and ignoring direct questions. It's safe to say he no longer cares, now that it's clear saddam won't be banned.

[Dauphin]

Ok, I can just about see that interpretation.

However, as I did not explicitly say that, or intend to impy it (it was meant to be a statement taken at face value) I can only conclude that some people read to deeply into a one line post.

[faded glory]

Oh yes, I studied that line very well

And you absolutely sided with Infat in suggesting that I should get worse than banned (somthing worse).


You 'Redefined' bye saying that what you meant to say was "Somthing worse, just not Banning"


Which is BS, because thats the only thing these guys at apolyton could do to me. Atleast I hope that is the only thing

[Wiglaf]

BC, Saddam, et al

(it was meant to be a statement taken at face value

<infatuation posts a thread complaining about saddam's diana comment, requests ban>
"I think his ignorance is more damning than any banning can inflict"

It's very unlikely you meant he was an ignorant person in general. We aren't reading deeply into anything, it looks like you've backed off from your position. Then again, wouldn't be the first time. Infatuation's left any and all of his supporters in the dust by completely ignoring any sensible questions asked to him.

You and infat wanted Saddam gone, it was rejected and laughed at, and now infat leaves and you change your story.

Seems that way to me, anyway. And if you really meant your words in their original form, sorry, they weren't cool anyway

[faded glory]

*clears throat*

Hello, erm, being a victim of foul play here. Infatuation could have easily conviced a mod to ban me. Then I would have been banned and silenced. Then I would have had no way to argue my case, because I would have been banned.

I understand that lieing is not illegal. But he clearly lied in an attempt to ban me. Which could have been a successful attempt. So I suggest banning him for trying to lie and ban me.

After all, this is like a cheap shot. A frivolous lawsuit with no basis, just an attempt to get what one wants, and then ride off into the sunset if he unsuccessful. This should be punished...He should not be allowed to simply do this. This is like 'Obstruction of Justice' and 'Purgury'.

Which makes me wonder,
How many other people has he gotten in trouble like this

Anyway hopefully you all will act on this.....

[DaShi]

Yes, he must be banned. Come mindless followers let's march on Britain until we root out the instigator.

[TCO]

Beating on Stew is a popular sport. But it gets old after a while...

[DaShi]

You'd have to ask him.

Wait. This isn't ACOL.

[Wiglaf]

What? He posted a screwover thread in the most cowardly fashion imaginable. How do you figure we're picking on him?