Porno ads again?

[Lews Therìn]

[Snapcase on Snapcase]

Mine just says "If you can't" and then freezes, with the top of omeones head half-covered by someone's chin.

(I thought the "She's Coming...Protect Yourself" ad was a bit low myself...)

[Lefty Scaevola]

Huummm, sex sells, huummm.

Can I kept the sex and not take the merchandise!?

------------------
Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
Pontificator Pendanticus
older richer & wiser than you

[Paul Hanson]

Porno ads? So what? Just ignore them. It`s hardly as it`s a picture of someone doing a woman up the arse now, is it?

[UltraSonix]

Interesting... what's wrong with that?!

------------------
No, in Australia we don't live with kangaroos and koalas in our backyards... Despite any stupid advertisments you may see to the contrary... (And no, koalas don't usually speak!)

[MarkG]

i can understand you being sensitive about the specific ad, but if think this is porno...
isn't it always to describe things as they really are?


beyond that, as we have said many times, we do not choose the ads one by one. if you have a problem with the ad, complain to the advertised.

[EVC]

These ads are so annoying.

[phoenixcager]

Haven't seen this one before, but if we had a problem with that ad about the nude codes, this is way worse.

[Dissident Aggressor]

wow, I didn't notice it at first. but now I see it. At first I couldn't figure out why everyone thought it was so bad.

well that's weird. after I posted, it changed. but it looked like she was performing a certain act before. Her head seemed to be moving back and forth. But now it just flashes to different parts of body.
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Dissident Aggressor (edited December 14, 2000).]</font>

[TCO]

Markos, I thought we got rid of thes ads. UGO seems like a sneaky bunch. Would you consider direct user fees instead. I would gladly pay.

[MarkG]

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by GP on 12-15-2000 12:15 AM</font>
Would you consider direct user fees instead. I would gladly pay.
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>and have even more people(currently one) feel as they are "customers" instead of "visitors"? no thanks

[Richard Bruns]

Thanks to Webwasher I don't usually see advertisements. I was considering turning it off to help Apolyton's revenue, but now I know to keep it on. Thanks for the warning. This is about the fifth time that UGO has shown this crap after promising to turn it off. I also know not to browse Apolyton in the school library.

[TCO]

Markos, who is "the one"?

Maybe if we went to a different format of bulletin board (I won't say which) , we would have less readers and no ad companies would bother with us anyway?

[DanQ]

The person at UGO who looks after the advertising run on affiliated gaming sites is the one who chooses the banner. These ads serve more than just to keep these forums online, GP, but also the entire site which takes up hundreds of MBs of diskspace, not to mention the bandwidth usage.

We have stated repeatedly in the past how to complain about ads that you feel are questionable, and this (forum thread) is not one of them.

----------------
Dan; Apolyton CS

[Mercantile]

not really offended by any of the ads, but they are annoying at times, especially the monkey one, i just want to tear its head off