suggestion

[DanQ]

I've alerted mark that he's "in demand" here. I'll let him address your concerns.

----------------
Dan; Apolyton CS

[Builder]

yes.

but it can be <font><big>NICE</big></font> if mark will actually ANSWER this!

[Builder]

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by DanQ on 11-02-2000 06:52 PM</font>
I've alerted mark that he's "in demand" here. I'll let him address your concerns.

<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

[Builder]

feel free to ignore us mark...

[Lefty Scaevola]

. i concur in page size reduction. I surf from three different platforms, from a 33.5k modem to a DSL, and the page load time for the modem is long one.

------------------
Gauis Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
older richer & wiser than you

[Builder]

bump

[Urban Ranger]

It has less to do with the number of posts than the code UBB emits for making the webpage layout pretty. I was looking at the size of the HTML file and it's quite large. I wonder if it would be smaller if more CSS and less HTML code is used.

But then, we have to be careful with IE users since IE is <em>diverging</em> from W3C standards.

[Dissident Aggressor]

get a faster modem
my pages load decent btw so don't change a thing. Some threads reach 50 in no time. If it involves sex it will reach 150 in no time. 150 is already to constrictive. so leave it

[Builder]

DA :

I'm not talking about a thread size.
I'm talking about a page size.