<h3>35217775</h3>
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ICQ FAQ (please leave your ICQ nmeber here)
Collapse
X
-
If you want to mantain it--fine. I think that it is better if you'd let it be in a seperate thread...but whatever you want. I'd like to point out, however, how hard this would be for you, considering that not everyone who posts their birthday posts their ICQ#, and vice-virca. Besides, this will be quite confusing once you try to sort them...
Just one request. In the name of accuracy, if you use the AGE FAQ for this purpose, then please have the thread renamed, to something less specific (I'm sure that the Admins. can re-name threads). Prehaps "GENERAL FAQ", or jsut "FAQ".
One final thing. If you really do this, then please make the information publicly known, so that people will know to post there #s on the AGE FAQ, and noware else. Prehaps a paragraph on the about page would serve nicely.
*also serves as a bump*
------------------
adaMada
adamada@springmail.comCiv 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
Comment
-
I think it can work in the age faq, and I'm sure I can get Ming or someone else to change the name into "Apolytoner FAQ" or something similar....
It will work, but I'm going to need to use HTML to make tables (so that everything is organized in orderly columns).. That should take care of the problem that some will not want to tell their age.. it won't look bad if everything's in neat columns..
Problem is, I don't know how to do that, let me go start a thread in the OT for help
Comment
-
Go to
http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum20/HTML/000514.html
if you want to see what it looks like...
I've made a start with 5 ppl. As you will notice, it's possible to only fill in the age or only the ICQ # without the FAQ looking bad.
In fact, I think it looks much better than before..
Comments? Does anyone still think the ICQ faq should be separate, after seeing how the data looks in one single FAQ?
Comment
-
<h4>34558172</h4>"I'm really an american right-winger, i love the army and hate a forigners, communists, anarchists and ******s. I also belive in god and the american constitution."
-Kropotkin
I invented the question mark.
-Imran Siddiqui
TNapoleon
Former Resident SidGamer
Current Pandemonio.ORG Webmaster
FOREIGN ADVISER - People's Republic of Off-Topic (PROT)
Comment
-
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Narck on 06-16-2000 01:40 PM</font>
Oh btw, the FAQ will be renamed into "Apolytoner Age&ICQ FAQ" shortly, so that solves that problem
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Yes. Thanks for all of your effort and hard wrok. The only thing left is making it official (by posting the information someware (like the about page)).
------------------
adaMada
adamada@springmail.comCiv 3 Democracy Game:
PTW Game: Proud member of the Roleplay Team, and Ambassador to Glory of War
Intersite PTW Game: Member of Apolyton
Comment
-
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by adaMada on 06-16-2000 01:48 PM</font>
Yes. Thanks for all of your effort and hard wrok. The only thing left is making it official (by posting the information someware (like the about page)).
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>Later... I have enough work already right now... let's finish this first, and then I'll ask Mark and Dan to post info about it
Comment
-
If somebody wants to contact me, they can look in my profile.
Otherwise, people will just add everybody on the FAQ to their list and then either never use it or use it for mass spam, since the only people who would game my number through the FAQ (and wouldn't get it otherwise) would be people who wouldn't talk to me in the first place, no?All syllogisms have three parts.
Therefore this is not a syllogism.
Comment
Comment