What if a second system of rankings was set up: a ranking based upon post quality. Other users would be able to rank your posts on their quality. You would then recieve a second rating based upon the average (or total) of your post ratings. A fairly simple average based system that could be used is: <center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>
<font color="blue"> (The average would be rounded to the nearest whole number)</font>
excelent post = 5 pts
good post = 4 pts
average post = 3 pts
bad post = 2 pts
really bad post = 1 pt
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Using this system, a 3 would be displayed if you recieved the following rankings:
This list is rather obviously set up, but you can get the drift. A name could also be assigned to each ranking, so, if you had a 3, then you could be rated as an "average user"
A total based system is also workable; one which involves positive and negitive numbers…
------------------
adaMada
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by adaMada (edited March 30, 2000).]</font>
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>
<font color="blue"> (The average would be rounded to the nearest whole number)</font>
excelent post = 5 pts
good post = 4 pts
average post = 3 pts
bad post = 2 pts
really bad post = 1 pt
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
Using this system, a 3 would be displayed if you recieved the following rankings:
- really bad post (1)
- excelent post (5)
- average post (3)
This list is rather obviously set up, but you can get the drift. A name could also be assigned to each ranking, so, if you had a 3, then you could be rated as an "average user"
A total based system is also workable; one which involves positive and negitive numbers…
------------------
adaMada
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by adaMada (edited March 30, 2000).]</font>
Comment