I would have bumped the old thread, but someone archived it.
Anyway in the thread linked to, I ask Solver for information on what happened to the feature, and offer to take it over if he is not interested in doing it, or is just too busy.
He assures us he is interested and not too busy, and promises an interview by the end of January. It is now the end of February. It has been 18 months since the last interview.
In light of these facts I suggest once again it is time for someone else to take over this feature. I am interested in doing so. I don't want to step on Solver's toes but I feel enough slack has been given.
I will wait for an official response, since if I put in the time to do an interview I want it to be an acknowledged FoA interview not just some random poster chatting with another random poster.
Mark/Dan?
Anyway in the thread linked to, I ask Solver for information on what happened to the feature, and offer to take it over if he is not interested in doing it, or is just too busy.
He assures us he is interested and not too busy, and promises an interview by the end of January. It is now the end of February. It has been 18 months since the last interview.
In light of these facts I suggest once again it is time for someone else to take over this feature. I am interested in doing so. I don't want to step on Solver's toes but I feel enough slack has been given.
I will wait for an official response, since if I put in the time to do an interview I want it to be an acknowledged FoA interview not just some random poster chatting with another random poster.
Mark/Dan?
Comment