...or how I learned to stop worrying and love industrial pollution.
One thing I love about these forums is that once in a while, even after two years of single and multiplayer experience, I will read about a strategy or gambit that radically alters the way I play every game. That happened most recently with the new eco-damage formula. I must confess to having been brainwashed by the whole "green is good" paradigm expressed in the game interludes. I was spooked by losing huge bases to mile-high stacks of mindworms in the late game, and a few times when I lost echelon mirrors and boreholes to fungal blooms. I always kept ecodamage to a minimum and avoided it completely the whole game if I could. I believed that eco-damage was cumulative like it said in the manual. I built lots of Centauri Preserves, even in multiplayer. Sometimes I chose Green Economics just to reduce eco damage.
When the new eco-damage formula came out, I didn't accept it right away. I even tested it with the Scenario Editor and found that it didn't apply. But then I tested it in some real games. Sure enough, fungal blooms RAISE the threshold for ecodamage, not lower it! Each bloom increases the number of minerals you can harvest before eco-damage. Then, every Tree Farm and Hybrid Forest you build increases the number of clean minerals for your whole faction. It was quite a revealation. Now, instead of limiting mineral production when eco-damage appears, I designate a New Jersey base and start polluting massively. I go Free Market to increase eco-damage. I borehole to the max. Then after three or more fungal blooms I massively build Tree Farms and eco-damage is gone for the rest of the game! It's quite a turn around, really!
Has anyone else undergone a massive change in play style since testing the new eco-formula, or was everyone else already a big fan of industrial pollution?
One thing I love about these forums is that once in a while, even after two years of single and multiplayer experience, I will read about a strategy or gambit that radically alters the way I play every game. That happened most recently with the new eco-damage formula. I must confess to having been brainwashed by the whole "green is good" paradigm expressed in the game interludes. I was spooked by losing huge bases to mile-high stacks of mindworms in the late game, and a few times when I lost echelon mirrors and boreholes to fungal blooms. I always kept ecodamage to a minimum and avoided it completely the whole game if I could. I believed that eco-damage was cumulative like it said in the manual. I built lots of Centauri Preserves, even in multiplayer. Sometimes I chose Green Economics just to reduce eco damage.
When the new eco-damage formula came out, I didn't accept it right away. I even tested it with the Scenario Editor and found that it didn't apply. But then I tested it in some real games. Sure enough, fungal blooms RAISE the threshold for ecodamage, not lower it! Each bloom increases the number of minerals you can harvest before eco-damage. Then, every Tree Farm and Hybrid Forest you build increases the number of clean minerals for your whole faction. It was quite a revealation. Now, instead of limiting mineral production when eco-damage appears, I designate a New Jersey base and start polluting massively. I go Free Market to increase eco-damage. I borehole to the max. Then after three or more fungal blooms I massively build Tree Farms and eco-damage is gone for the rest of the game! It's quite a turn around, really!
Has anyone else undergone a massive change in play style since testing the new eco-formula, or was everyone else already a big fan of industrial pollution?
Comment