Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Faction Ideology in Social Engineering

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Faction Ideology in Social Engineering

    There are restrictions for factions based on their ideologies, as in each faction has an aversion to some kind of social engineering choice.

    I was just idly speculating as to just what choices each faction would make if they were running their empires based solely on ideology with no practical aspects.

    The choices would be stupid on occasion, amplifying strengths and weaknesses present in the social factors intrinsic to each faction.

    I'll probably get ignored, but if anyone has a point of view for any faction and the politics, economics, values and future society they would run based on ideology I'd be interested.

    For example, the Gaians would probably be Democratic, Green, Knowledge and Eudaimonic.

    In short, hippies, the lot of them! Not too sure about the future society choice, because cybernetic gives the +2 Planet rating. Would Deirdre hand over her administration to computers so she could spend more time dancing naked through the trees?

    This of course has no relevance to the game, unless you really like to get into character...

  • #2
    I think it's more interesting to talk about SE choices that are available to factions but seem out-of-place. For example, take Fundamentalist. It would make sense if the Gaians go Fundy, especially if they want to go on a temporary ecoterrorism rampage. But Morgan? What would that guy want to be so Fundamentalist about?

    Another example: Yang can choose a Free Market, especially if he also adds Wealth and Golden Age to get to the critical point of +2 Economy. But would such choices make sense given his ideals for an atheistic police state?

    One more example: Santiago can choose any SE setting except Wealth. But it seems all the SE settings available to her make perfect sense. Free Market? Yeah, a free market for guns. Green? Only to support an army of mindworms. Knowledge? Of course, they're always researching new ways to kill!

    Comment


    • #3
      Just a thought on Yang. Strictly by ideology, his future society would have to be thought control, IMHO.

      I'd like to know what people think about Lal's future society. I think he would most certainly be Dem/Green/Knowledge/Eudaimonic, but he could also be cybernetic. What does everyone think?
      "Beauty is not in the face...Beauty is a light in the heart." - Kahlil Gibran
      "The greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved; loved for ourselves, or rather, loved in spite of ourselves" - Victor Hugo
      "It is noble to be good; it is still nobler to teach others to be good -- and less trouble." - Mark Twain

      Comment


      • #4
        Lal is the opposite of Yang and Sparta, thus, he is a capitalist, thus, he would choose wealth...damn Arab oil shieks (no offense to any Arabs)

        Comment


        • #5
          would Lal give´up his democratic powress to an AI? I think not... Eudaimonia, definitely.
          Miriam would be Yangish, Fund/Planned/Power/Eudaimonia.
          Santiago; Police/Planned/Power/Thought ctrl.
          Pirates are a pretty tough call IMHO. Maybe Demo/Free/Power/Eudaimonia. They are pirates, so maybe Wealth...
          Cake and grief counseling will be available at the conclusion of the test. Thank you for helping us help you help us all!

          Comment


          • #6
            Yay, I get to make a list:

            Gaians: Fundamentalist/Green/Knowlege/Eudiamonic
            Hive: Police State/Planned/Power/Thought Control
            Believers: Fundamentalist/Planned/Power/Thought Control
            Morganites: Democratic/Free Market/Wealth/Eudiamonic
            University: Democratic/Planned/Knowledge/Cybernetic
            Spartans: Police State/Planned/Power/Thought Control
            Peacekeepers: Democratic/Free Market/Knowledge/Eudiamonic

            Cult: Fundamentalist/Green/Power/Though Control
            Cyborgs: Democratic/Planned/Knowledge/Cybernetic
            Pirates: Democratic/Free Market/Power/
            Drones: Democratic/Planned/Power/Eudiamonic
            Angels: Democratic/Free Market/Knowledge/Cybernetic
            Usurpers: Police State/Planned/Power/Thought Control
            Caretakers: Fundamentalist/Planned/Power/Cybernetic



            Now if you want to go for wierd/opposite settings: (a few favorites)

            Hive in Eudiamonic
            Believers in Wealth/Cybernetic
            Morganites in Police State/Thought Control is sort of appropirate in a way. Especially Thought Control through advertising.
            University in Thought Control
            Peacekeepers in Fundamentalist/Thought Control

            Cult in Planned is appropirate. Remember they pollute a fair amount according to their description.
            Cyborgs in Free Market/Wealth or Though Control
            Drones in Police State/Free Market/Power/Thought Control is one of my Favorites. Everything they hate in one go (except maybe power).
            Angels in Police State/Thought Control

            On a side note, I find it funny that the drones can use planned. I would have thought industrial wage slaving would be their nemesis. Although I understand that if you think of them as pro-union industrial workers they would hate Green and love Planned.
            Fitz. (n.) Old English
            1. Child born out of wedlock.
            2. Bastard.

            Comment


            • #7
              I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs. Of all the factions, they seem the most righteous. Miriam is righteous, but seems to understand she's alone. Lal seems to see the world as misunderstanding the obvious truths of secular humanism. I like Yangs position (seemingly). He doesn't really care about anything but the Hive.

              -Smack
              Visit Aldebaran:Aldebaranweb

              Comment


              • #8
                I still say Lal would go green b/c of all of the tech and facility blurbs. Many of them talk about the ecology of Planet and foolishly disrupting it and so on and so forth...
                "Beauty is not in the face...Beauty is a light in the heart." - Kahlil Gibran
                "The greatest happiness of life is the conviction that we are loved; loved for ourselves, or rather, loved in spite of ourselves" - Victor Hugo
                "It is noble to be good; it is still nobler to teach others to be good -- and less trouble." - Mark Twain

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by death_head
                  Lal is the opposite of Yang and Sparta, thus, he is a capitalist, thus, he would choose wealth...damn Arab oil shieks (no offense to any Arabs)
                  He's Indian. Listen carefully to the inflection of his 'V's as 'W'
                  (And it says so in his faction profile.. )

                  No offense taken
                  Last edited by Nadexander; July 26, 2001, 17:09.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think cyborgs work very well with Free Market considering they have enough efficiency even without Green. And I don't think their cybernetic ideology has much enthusiasm towards Ecological thinking or mindworm preservation.

                    I think Drone ideology is close to socialism we know. Perhaps a bit more genuine and working class centered. All socialisms did pervert into Dictatorships with even worst class societies than in the West, things got better here(!)...and now they're getting worst...
                    "What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a God! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals!" - Shakespeare

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Nadexander


                      He's Indian. Listen carefully to the inflection of his 'V's as 'W'
                      (And it says so in his faction profile.. )
                      "Lal" means love or something else cuddly in Hindi, which is talked just about only in India.
                      Cake and grief counseling will be available at the conclusion of the test. Thank you for helping us help you help us all!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        We don't have to wonder if Lal would go AI.
                        He went cybernetic.
                        Check through the soundfiles.
                        Tech52:
                        "I think, and my thoughts cross the barrier, into the synapses of the machine, just as the good doctor intended; but what I cannot shake, and what hints at things to come, is that throughts cross back. In my dreams, the sensibility of the machine invades the perifery of my conciousness: Dark, rigid, cold, alien. Evolution is at work here, but just what is evolving remains to be seen."
                        Comissioner Provin Lal, Man and Machine.


                        Indra

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Smack
                          I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs. Of all the factions, they seem the most righteous. Miriam is righteous, but seems to understand she's alone. Lal seems to see the world as misunderstanding the obvious truths of secular humanism. I like Yangs position (seemingly). He doesn't really care about anything but the Hive.

                          -Smack
                          Well, I really don't see Lal the same way you do. Excluding how the AI seems to play Lal like the backstabber he isn't (or shouldn't be, in my opinion), I think Lal is most concerned about preserving and advancing the cause of inalienable human rights. Sure, he has a desire to convert all of Planet over to his side, but it seems people are indeed listening to him, or else he wouldn't be getting 50% more Council votes than the other factions.

                          So Lal is definitely one who prefers Democratic over anything else. He's probably flexible with any choice of SE Economics, depending on which political party within his faction has the majority at the time (Republican, Democrat, or Green ). He'll also be rather flexible with SE Values, though I can't imagine him staying in Power for a very long period of time. Probably only to carry out UN-style "peacekeeping" missions, and only for a short while.

                          As for Future Society, I can definitely see him preferring Eudamonia over anything else. (To Black Sunrise) We know Lal experienced what it's like to go cybernetic, but that doesn't mean he prefers to go that route en force. Indeed, by the time of Future Societies, every faction will have researched and implemented technologies like Mind/Machine Interface and Sentient Computers (sp?), even those who have issues with them. Heck, I'll bet even Miriam would not hesitate to use these techs, if only as a means to a contradictory end.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think the Lal we know from 'Journey to Alpha Centauri' or Michael Ely's Centauri Dawn is not the same we face in via commlink diplomacy. Though Centauri Dawn is somewhat in contradiction with the original 'Journey to Alpha Centauri', but nothing that major. In game, Lal is a genuine and true backstabber, as said.

                            Miriam commlink alter ego is also interesting. In Journey to Alpha Centauri Miriam was one the two becoming faction leaders that were against the idea of sharing the landing pods between the officers. And Miriam seemed also very peaceful, empathic and understanding...nothing like fundamentalist we see in the game. I guess she just lost it during the landing.
                            "What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a God! The beauty of the world! The paragon of animals!" - Shakespeare

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think of the peacekeepers as essentially a fundamentalist group. They are so 'charter-thumping' and use that as a cover to hide their desire to convert everyone to their beliefs. Of all the factions, they seem the most righteous. Miriam is righteous, but seems to understand she's alone. Lal seems to see the world as misunderstanding the obvious truths of secular humanism.
                              Well said. I think the real UN and the US Democratic party both fall into this trap.

                              As far as the game goes, seems like it's not possible for the AI to effectively play the Peacekeeper faction in the spirit in which it was intended.

                              And what to say about Deidre? I'm too young to know firsthand, but everything I've seen, read, and heard about tells me that hippies were fundamentalists of this type, too.

                              And on the lighter side - what about those Pirates? If we think of them as happy-go-lucky swashbuckling rogue privateers, then there's no organized government. You've got Frontier and Wealth. Future society? Who cares about the future? We're having too good of a time now... But the truth is rarely so glamorous - more realistically, they'd be run like a brutal organized crime syndicate. But I like to think Sven and his followers are better than that.
                              "Minding Your Business Since 1991"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X