Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

bunkers - do You build them?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bunkers - do You build them?

    I would like to know what You think of bunkers.
    I nearly never build them, because I use the
    defense by attack defending style and see bunkers in my territory as a possible stepstone for an advancing enemy.
    The only use I could imagine a bunker is usefull is on
    a "bottleneck" as protection for a armored crawler.

    Do You build bunkers and for which purpos?

    Greetings Skanderbeg

  • #2
    I'm not a big fan of bunkers and my formers are usualy out doing other things, but with just about anything there is a time and place for them.

    If I find myself next to the Sargosso (SP) Sea and have some peninsula that I'm not planning on building on, then by all means a bunker is going to be built since I know mind worm are going to be attacking from that direction.

    Comment


    • #3
      I have never built one for the reasons you give above. By the time they are available I am usually ready to deal with any invaders on my territory with a relentless offense. I've never built an airfield either btw, though I could see them being useful on occaision.
      He's got the Midas touch.
      But he touched it too much!
      Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

      Comment


      • #4
        I'll sometimes build them in the process of doing an invasion.

        As I normally hate to build a Navy, I often times rely on air power and build a land bridge in my conquering phase.

        That being said my lead elements are normally formers followed by speeders and covered by air power.

        As I approach a destination base I'll create a forward bunker (since I'm road building from my own continent to bring up the speeders) and have the formers that built the bunker housed inside. In this way, if the enemy base attacks my lead elements they are not capable of attacking my rear elements (combat speeders) and instead have to make their way through the formers first (which by this time have been mostly armored). If they are capable of taking out the formers then the next unit gets stopped cold by having to capture the bunker and can still not attack my speeders.

        In the event that happens, air power is employed to clean out the bunker thereby allowing my speeders to march forward and do untold damage to the enemy base. Of course airpower gets employed to help cleanout the enemy base as well, but the primary goal is to protect those speeders from harm thereby allowing base capture and continuance of the blitzgreig.

        All in all its just a means for me to 'catch my breath' before I start the main assualt.
        "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

        “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

        Comment


        • #5
          I've built them in multiplayer before, but it wasn't as successfull as I hoped for, though my opponent did go around it as opposed to attacking it straight on so I guess I could argue that it did serve its purpose.

          I don't know that you really need them after you get the knack of single player games. I often end up on the offense and go about capturing my opponents bunkers, but get little use out of them except for a turn or two.

          I'd be interested to know what other multiplayers have done. I think that a bunker and a sensor adding 75% to defense is a real boon, but the only problem is getting your opponent to attack it. On the other hand, I suppose you build it in hopes that they won't attack actually. A sort of leave-me-alone-I've-got-bunkers-over-here message.

          Comment


          • #6
            Good thread! Bunkers really DON'T get a lot of play, but I have to admit to being a fan of them, especially where defense of the homeland is concerned. I do build them on occassion as part of a general offensive, and in much the same way Og described, but I have to admit to having the tendency to go waaaay overboard when it comes to defending the homeland, and bunkers provide a way to put more of those multiplicative defensive modifiers into play.

            Due to time constraints, there's almost no way you could construct a necklace of bunkers around your coast and man them with at least two units....it'd be kinna cool I guess, but it would also be ruinously expensive both in terms of construction time and total mineral costs involved, but Bunkers DO have one extremely cool use, and that would be Metagame.

            Suppose, for example, you want to make it extremely unattractive for an invader to land on your southern coast (which is, incidentally, where the bulk of your crawlers live and work). So, as part of your terraforming efforts in that region, you take the time to construct a necklace of bunkers at intervals of every other tile (perhaps 6 total bunkers). This would, in turn, create a huge "zone" of zoc-blocked coast....at least, once you manned those six bunkers (you'd have a relatively permanant block a whopping fourteen tiles wide), and there aren't too many would-be invaders who wanna be tied down like that--not to mention the fact that other sections of your coast appear totally undefended, and this section is fairly swarming with units--which would most likely prompt them to land on some other portion of your coast, which is exactly why you built the bunkers in the first place, and, since most invaders are in too much of a hurry to get overly sneaky, you can simiply trace the shortest path from the bunkers to the nearest strip of unguarded coast, and figure that'll be where the bulk of your attacks come from, and knowing that, you can set up all sorts of unseen surprises for anybody who tries to drive around your defensive works.

            One of the coolest uses of Metagame approaches is to present your opponents with an obviously unattractive choice, which will prompt them to do the very thing you want them to do (even if they don't know it....no, *especially* if they don't know it).

            Also keep in mind that unless somebody just has it out for you in particular, attackers are looking for soft kills....they don't WANT to fight somebody who's well defended, and bunkers bristling with all sorts of defenders can send a pretty strong message, even while the bulk of your forces are out beating the daylights out of somebody else....

            -=Vel=-
            The list of published books grows. If you're curious to see what sort of stories I weave out, head to Amazon.com and do an author search for "Christopher Hartpence." Help support Candle'Bre, a game created by gamers FOR gamers. All proceeds from my published works go directly to the project.

            Comment


            • #7
              I seldom build bunkers because they don't provide protection to air attacks. If they did it would be a different story...

              Comment


              • #8
                I like to play Morgan or Aki-Zeta as purely defensive games; I set myself the challenge of not going on the offensive, but building a strong enough defensive force that attackers just smash themselves on me. I find that bunkers have come in handy a couple times in these situations.

                Also, while I haven't actually done this, a bunker seems like it could be handy when making a shore landing: if you have enough transport space to include some rover formers with your troops, they could make an excellent landing site for you. It's always the most vulnerable time, otherwise. Just an idea.

                Comment


                • #9
                  A question for the floor. What sort of terraforming can you build a bunker on? In other words, can you build one on a borehole without erasing the borehole? What about condensors?
                  He's got the Midas touch.
                  But he touched it too much!
                  Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Sik,

                    Bunkers as far as I know can be put onto any square (except occean of course). Using a specialist game with tons o' formers, makes rapid hardening of key squares ala boreholes and condensor/farm/soil enrichers a breeze.

                    Armor up those crawlers and place them in the bunkers my freind. Real point as described before tho' is you normally have better tasks for those formers anyway like converting condensor/famrs into condensor soil enrichers etc.

                    Og
                    "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                    “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks Ogie. Another question for you. Does the AI ever build marines in order to invade your continent? I typically occupy every square of coastline to keep the AI from landing troops or probe teams. If they never build marines, then building bunkers would just be overkill. It does amuse me to think that every coast square contains either a well defended base or a bunker with a good defender though.
                      He's got the Midas touch.
                      But he touched it too much!
                      Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Good point 'bout bunkers NOT providing any boost where air attacks are concerned, but I'd still contend that they're a good investment, especially if you've got a fistful of formers who have just finished up critical terraforming in a given region....before sending them off to the next spot, have them take a few turns to double or triple up on bunker production, at the very least on your most productive and/or exposed tiles. A AAA scout can easily be upgraded to max armor\decent weapon and placed in the tile with a crawler, providing a nice double stacked defense (esp. if said crawler is outfitted with Trance ability). If worms call, the crawler will make short work of it, and if it's an air strike, then your AAA defender will take the first hit--and, with careful planning, of course ALL your bunkers will be inside your sensor net, giving you a 25% boost which IS effective vs. air assault....not quite as good as a base proper, mind you, but it certainly takes less micromanagement!

                        -=Vel=-
                        The list of published books grows. If you're curious to see what sort of stories I weave out, head to Amazon.com and do an author search for "Christopher Hartpence." Help support Candle'Bre, a game created by gamers FOR gamers. All proceeds from my published works go directly to the project.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Sik,

                          I've seen the AI build Marines but almost inevitably does not know how to use them. Any invastion is at best piece meal ( a single transport maybe two and almost never supported by air power).

                          To me I've gotten great utility out of a Morgan game wherein I was on a fairly nice sized continent and a small isthmus connected me to Miriam. I was running FM/wealth and used but one or two elite Plasma - ECM probe teams in a bunker with a sensor to shut her down cold. Wave upon wave of her laser speeders were chewed up 'gainst a single armored probe team outside my borders. When it finally fell I was able to put another little sucker in the bunker and hold the line. I think 2 units were successfuly able to defend 'gainst 10 speeders. A little later I ended up with D:AP and was able to switch to Green/Wealth and take the fight to Miriam.

                          Does any one remember if other terrain adds to the defense factor for bunkers. For example if you build a bunker sensor on a rocky do you get a +50%, +25%, and +50% for the rocky square? I'm almost positive it does and as a consequence of building my 3 tile wide land bridges to other continents I'll make it a point going forward to build a bunker sensor on a rocky in the center tile in case my offensive has to be halted.
                          [This message has been edited by Ogie Oglethorpe (edited December 15, 2000).]
                          "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                          “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Artillery is a bit stupid, when it comes to defnse modifiers. Units in rolling or flat get +50% to represent maneuverability (oooo, that isn't spelt right!) But Units in rocky get +50% anyway. So basically, you ALWAYS get +50% against arty!
                            The church is the only organisation that exists for the benefit of its non-members
                            Buy your very own 4-dimensional, non-orientable, 1-sided, zero-edged, zero-volume, genus 1 manifold immersed in 3-space!
                            All women become like their mothers. That is their tragedy. No man does. That's his.
                            "They offer us some, but we have no place to store a mullet." - Chegitz Guevara

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Sikander:

                              If I recall correctly, Bunkers will replace Mines and Sensor Arrays, but will live happily with Boreholes and Farms and Forests and Solar Panels. But I probably don't recall correctly. How the heck could a Bunker replace a Mine but not a Borehole? Well, that's what I remember, anyway.

                              Over in AC-Creation, Simpson II was talking about making a Datalinks mod that corrected all the errors, and I recommended that he also make it spell out which terraforming choices cancelled out each other. I wonder if he ever got anywhere on that...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X