Why dedicating a thread to a Faction leader name? Because I just realised that it is extremely well thought - except that I couldn't find an explanation for "Aki", except for the history of the leader. But I think there is someone called Aki on this forum, who could explain this part.
So, an algorithm takes over the brain of a living person. So it is only too clear to call oneself Prime Function instead of Prime Minister. The rest is a bit of maths. The Riemannian zeta function is perhaps one of the most pathological of the important mathematical functions. A link to a list of links to the zeta function can be found here by those who are not afraid of maths. The zeta function at an integer s can be expressed as the product of 1/(1-p^s) over all prime numbers p. It has also a relation to the proof that the prime number counting function p(n), which is the number of all prime numbers less than n, can be approximated by the logarithmic integral Li(n). So, the zeta function is a veritable prime function (and even more). There is one major problem: For all even numbers 2, 4, 6, ... the value of the zeta function is proved to be an irrational number, as well as zeta(3). For zeta(5) this is not yet shown, so there is still a slight chance that this number is rational, therefore Aki Zeta-5. I think there went quite a bit of thought into this name.
I have not yet found another so well thought or fitting name, the real Andrej Zakharov was definitely pacifist (at least after he built the H-bomb), and not erratic. Perhaps there is something with Cha Dawn, who may be something like a reincarnation of Buddha (I think, a few years ago there actually was a new-born (or still very young) boy found by Buddhist priests to be a reincarnation). But this doesn't seem to be so much beyond the normal level of thought that goes into making up names. Shen-Ji Yang or Corazon Santiago just seems to be "looking Chinese" or "something Spanish/Latin American". I would like to be proved wrong.
A side note: Transcendent numbers (e. g. e, pi) are those which are irrational and not algebraic (i. e. not to be expressed as a zero of a polynomial with rational coefficients). It is shown that for zeta(n) with n even is a transcendent number, but this is not clear for zeta(5). If you want to role-play SMAX, would it be against faction characteristics to use Transcendi or to achieve The Ascent to Transcendence?
So, an algorithm takes over the brain of a living person. So it is only too clear to call oneself Prime Function instead of Prime Minister. The rest is a bit of maths. The Riemannian zeta function is perhaps one of the most pathological of the important mathematical functions. A link to a list of links to the zeta function can be found here by those who are not afraid of maths. The zeta function at an integer s can be expressed as the product of 1/(1-p^s) over all prime numbers p. It has also a relation to the proof that the prime number counting function p(n), which is the number of all prime numbers less than n, can be approximated by the logarithmic integral Li(n). So, the zeta function is a veritable prime function (and even more). There is one major problem: For all even numbers 2, 4, 6, ... the value of the zeta function is proved to be an irrational number, as well as zeta(3). For zeta(5) this is not yet shown, so there is still a slight chance that this number is rational, therefore Aki Zeta-5. I think there went quite a bit of thought into this name.
I have not yet found another so well thought or fitting name, the real Andrej Zakharov was definitely pacifist (at least after he built the H-bomb), and not erratic. Perhaps there is something with Cha Dawn, who may be something like a reincarnation of Buddha (I think, a few years ago there actually was a new-born (or still very young) boy found by Buddhist priests to be a reincarnation). But this doesn't seem to be so much beyond the normal level of thought that goes into making up names. Shen-Ji Yang or Corazon Santiago just seems to be "looking Chinese" or "something Spanish/Latin American". I would like to be proved wrong.
A side note: Transcendent numbers (e. g. e, pi) are those which are irrational and not algebraic (i. e. not to be expressed as a zero of a polynomial with rational coefficients). It is shown that for zeta(n) with n even is a transcendent number, but this is not clear for zeta(5). If you want to role-play SMAX, would it be against faction characteristics to use Transcendi or to achieve The Ascent to Transcendence?
Comment