Playing at the level just below transcend, I find myself in a rather interesting situation: The situation I am in is precisely where I hoped to find myself. I am playing one I call "Captain Drajjensgard" of the Spartans. The one who recognizes that poorly spelled name will understand my motives in this particular game. I am playing on a "standard" sized random world.
I started out on a fair sized continent (the largest in the game, I think). I met up with Morgan fairly early, and, true to the philosophy I emulate in this particular game, quickly allied with him. Unfortunately for him, I cut off his expansion rather early, though after I shared my knowledge of shipbuilding with him, he picked back up again. He taught me to use Free Market, and thus I did.
A little later, I ran into Provost Zhakarov, who, though he declined to ally with me immediately, was friendly and traded tech with me readily. Later on, he did ally. We were the only people on this continent, and we were all strongly allied.
I did use a planned economy for a little while, to ensure that I got ahead of Zhakarov in land and population early on, to ensure that I lead the coalition (and that it remained a coalition). Fortunatly, Morgan didn't even try to talk to me until after I'd switched back to Free Market.
So here we are, three great enlightened leaders on the greatest continent, all with a Democratic government, Free Market economy, valuing Knowledge above all (yes, all three of us chose that combination.
Arrayed against us is the rest of the world. "Brother" Lal leads a population of deluded fools who, though they make decisions "democratically," they have rejected true freedom, deciding that the majority is absolute (Democracy, Planned, Power).
Dirdre made her opposition to us known early on, decrying our "Exploitation" of Planet (but what value does matter of any form have if it is not utilized?) She follows the same societal path as Brother Lal, including the Planned economy!
Yang is the most brutal of all, demanding absolute submission from his people (Police State, Planned), and his brutality has reduced his society to the point where they value nothing but the basest form of Survival.
Miriam, the most powerful of them, prays to her ghost in the sky, purporting the morality of submitting oneself to the whims of one who claims some sort of "spiritual" perception that others lack. Of corse, her Fundamentalist government saps the creativity of her people, and she, too, plans her economy, to the destruction of all.
They are united only in their hatred of us. Other than that, they war amongst one another. The most base of them all is Lal, for rather than standing with those of us who stand for that which is right, he instead refuses to associate with us, and thus invites his own destruction by the Believers. He will soon be little more than a memory, and has only himself to blame. At least the others are consistant. His irrational desire for world hegemony, his reckless devotion to the "UN Charter" is his downfall. For the record, were it not for my support, the UN Charter would've been gone long ago.
Has anyone else ever plaed a game so perfectly divided among idiological lines?
I started out on a fair sized continent (the largest in the game, I think). I met up with Morgan fairly early, and, true to the philosophy I emulate in this particular game, quickly allied with him. Unfortunately for him, I cut off his expansion rather early, though after I shared my knowledge of shipbuilding with him, he picked back up again. He taught me to use Free Market, and thus I did.
A little later, I ran into Provost Zhakarov, who, though he declined to ally with me immediately, was friendly and traded tech with me readily. Later on, he did ally. We were the only people on this continent, and we were all strongly allied.
I did use a planned economy for a little while, to ensure that I got ahead of Zhakarov in land and population early on, to ensure that I lead the coalition (and that it remained a coalition). Fortunatly, Morgan didn't even try to talk to me until after I'd switched back to Free Market.
So here we are, three great enlightened leaders on the greatest continent, all with a Democratic government, Free Market economy, valuing Knowledge above all (yes, all three of us chose that combination.
Arrayed against us is the rest of the world. "Brother" Lal leads a population of deluded fools who, though they make decisions "democratically," they have rejected true freedom, deciding that the majority is absolute (Democracy, Planned, Power).
Dirdre made her opposition to us known early on, decrying our "Exploitation" of Planet (but what value does matter of any form have if it is not utilized?) She follows the same societal path as Brother Lal, including the Planned economy!
Yang is the most brutal of all, demanding absolute submission from his people (Police State, Planned), and his brutality has reduced his society to the point where they value nothing but the basest form of Survival.
Miriam, the most powerful of them, prays to her ghost in the sky, purporting the morality of submitting oneself to the whims of one who claims some sort of "spiritual" perception that others lack. Of corse, her Fundamentalist government saps the creativity of her people, and she, too, plans her economy, to the destruction of all.
They are united only in their hatred of us. Other than that, they war amongst one another. The most base of them all is Lal, for rather than standing with those of us who stand for that which is right, he instead refuses to associate with us, and thus invites his own destruction by the Believers. He will soon be little more than a memory, and has only himself to blame. At least the others are consistant. His irrational desire for world hegemony, his reckless devotion to the "UN Charter" is his downfall. For the record, were it not for my support, the UN Charter would've been gone long ago.
Has anyone else ever plaed a game so perfectly divided among idiological lines?
Comment