What's better - the nuke from civ2 or the planet buster? One wipes out a base, one leaves it available for capture. One needs a vote to be effectively used, one doesn't. Is there any clear winner?
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by SMACed (edited December 04, 2000).]</font>
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by SMACed (edited December 04, 2000).]</font>

I guess if you repeal the charter planet busters make sense eco-damage wise, but I think they harm chrion anyway.
. But when it wipes out a base can that be a bad thing?
Comment