History has taught us that waging a war without clear objectives often ends in disaster.
So, what should be ours?
I see a few options:
A) We take his two nearest cities (Hole of Aspiration and Laborer's Throng if I remember) and it should be enough for him to ask for truce, what we accept and ask for a Treaty. Motive: this vendetta wastes resources while the others grow, and Yang is more valuable to us as a threat to the others and in war with Morgan (plus the occasional tech he provides)
B) Same as above and with same motives but we don't accept until we have taken his 3 cities, allowing us to fortify the chokepoint town later, thus denying him any future attack possibility.
C) We turn to war production and won't stop for as long as we can grab something more. That means we could as well take 2 cities or 5 or 8, depending on how it goes. In this case, the question is to define when we reach the stalemate.
D) You have another idea and you'll post it.
My own choice is not ready yet...
So, what should be ours?
I see a few options:
A) We take his two nearest cities (Hole of Aspiration and Laborer's Throng if I remember) and it should be enough for him to ask for truce, what we accept and ask for a Treaty. Motive: this vendetta wastes resources while the others grow, and Yang is more valuable to us as a threat to the others and in war with Morgan (plus the occasional tech he provides)
B) Same as above and with same motives but we don't accept until we have taken his 3 cities, allowing us to fortify the chokepoint town later, thus denying him any future attack possibility.
C) We turn to war production and won't stop for as long as we can grab something more. That means we could as well take 2 cities or 5 or 8, depending on how it goes. In this case, the question is to define when we reach the stalemate.
D) You have another idea and you'll post it.
My own choice is not ready yet...
Comment