Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Elections of 2107.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Elections of 2107.



    Lord of Development (appointed Chaos Theory)
    Lord of Security (appointed Illuminatus)
    Lord of Progress (appointed Net Warrior)
    Chairman of the Council of Lords (appointed Chaos Theory)
    Deputy Chairman of the Council of Lords (appointed smacksim)

    This is in order, alright? And, now another question in elections: should we make a thread for each turn or a single thread for all turns.

    One thread is advantageous, because it is easy to keep track of everything, planning of faction growth is continuous, and not divided on turns and does not polute the environment with hundreds of threads.
    Multiple threads - it is hard to keep track of them after some time, and forum gets poluted with them. When I read Hive forum, it sure showed . However they supposably have a benefit of summarizing things.
    3
    One is ecosafe :b:
    33.33%
    1
    Multiple threads :b:
    33.33%
    1
    :ana: Xenobanans are :b:
    33.33%
    1
    Last edited by Illuminatus; July 13, 2004, 08:32.
    SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
    The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.Shaw
    Tags: None
  • #2
    It's hard to have proper elections for positions when there are only ~5 people to fill them. Besides, everyone gets to contribute wherever they want, regardless of official position.

    I prefer multiple turn planning threads, because for each new year, we can summarize everything worthwhile from previous years, and then plan ahead, automatically cleaning the active turn planning thread every turn. How are multiple threads more work for you?
    "Cutlery confused Stalin"
    -BBC news

    Comment

    • #3
      What do you mean by "This is in order, alright?" I don't get it. I support the previous candidates for another term.

      About turn threads...I can see that it would be a pain to read them all after the game. It's nice to have them separate during the game though. I can live with either, especially if labelled with the years involved.
      Aldebaran 2.1 for Smax is in Beta Testing. Join us for our first Succession Game

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by smacksim
        What do you mean by "This is in order, alright?"
        That is exactly what
        I support the previous candidates for another term.
        means.
        About turn threads...I can see that it would be a pain to read them all after the game. It's nice to have them separate during the game though. I can live with either, especially if labelled with the years involved.
        How about this? I will merge any turn thread older than five turns with other old ones? This way it will be easy to track everything and we won't suffer from too many threads.
        SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
        The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.Shaw

        Comment

        • #5
          That sounds perfect, if it's not too much work for you.
          Aldebaran 2.1 for Smax is in Beta Testing. Join us for our first Succession Game

          Comment

          • #6
            I should return to my full duties next week. Then I can finish work in forum.
            SMAC/X FAQ | Chiron Archives
            The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man. --G.B.Shaw

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...
            X