Well I exhausted game analysis, and I still haven't got the reply from the drones. So I suppose I'll go to the next step. Because slightly over 30 posts in a day while I've been cooling my feet waiting for a reply just isn't enough.
I've been trawling through the usual internet garbage out there. Collecting information on the personalities of some of the members. Also trusting Googlie's opinions a bit.
In my opinion usually you can tell the people that will backstab you because they're the ones that will flame other people. The people you can usually trust to keep their word are the ones that are polite to everyone and if dislike someone simply won't talk to them. Then you have the ones that are friendly to people. Those are the ones which will help you if you are weaker, and may sometimes betray you if you're stronger or equal strength (or a good friend). I actually don't mind getting betrayed by those people... kindof hard to explain why. I guess it's because they're just after some fun and nobody can really contradict that reasoning.
Googlie read your post on mark. He seems kind of like the 3rd kind of person . I think in a team game, random insanity for fun is usually overruled by the group. He'll probably be trustworthy.
MRT144, seems to be a loose gun. However, I if they have a democracy not the loudest voice we should be okay. I'm uncertain about Main_Brain but he doesn't seem too bad. The other drones are all polite and I believe will keep their word.
I suppose the problem will in what we can agree on with them and making sure our "protective manvoeuring", which I feel is mainly to make us feel safe, won't make them think we're backing out.
Kody
I've been trawling through the usual internet garbage out there. Collecting information on the personalities of some of the members. Also trusting Googlie's opinions a bit.
In my opinion usually you can tell the people that will backstab you because they're the ones that will flame other people. The people you can usually trust to keep their word are the ones that are polite to everyone and if dislike someone simply won't talk to them. Then you have the ones that are friendly to people. Those are the ones which will help you if you are weaker, and may sometimes betray you if you're stronger or equal strength (or a good friend). I actually don't mind getting betrayed by those people... kindof hard to explain why. I guess it's because they're just after some fun and nobody can really contradict that reasoning.
Googlie read your post on mark. He seems kind of like the 3rd kind of person . I think in a team game, random insanity for fun is usually overruled by the group. He'll probably be trustworthy.
MRT144, seems to be a loose gun. However, I if they have a democracy not the loudest voice we should be okay. I'm uncertain about Main_Brain but he doesn't seem too bad. The other drones are all polite and I believe will keep their word.
I suppose the problem will in what we can agree on with them and making sure our "protective manvoeuring", which I feel is mainly to make us feel safe, won't make them think we're backing out.
Kody
Comment