ending the game?

[GeneralTacticus]

Drop the brackets.

/me is still testing.

[Kassiopeia]

color=whatever is nearly as evil as speaking Finnish Actually using it does not boost one's evilness however, ESPECIALLY if your name is TKG or Lemmy.

begin code

/me slaps colour-users around a bit with a hefty fish

end code

/me slaps colour-users around a bit with a hefty fish

Edit - and it is NOT a "tag", it's used like the describe action -function on IRC. Heh, indeed, one of the first comments after Markos introduced it was "too much IRC Markos?"

[Lemmy]

Actually using it does not boost one's evilness however, ESPECIALLY if your name is TKG or Lemmy.

aah..too bad

Back on-topic:
Yes to ending the game.

[DeathByTheSword]

and yes to a second game...!

/me tries to /me command also and likes the /me commmand /me knew about the /me command before this thread but because all of the talk about the /me command wanted to show he could do it also

[FlameFlash]

Originally posted by Archaic
Perhaps we should have some team's for the next one, divided along the ideologies.....

That would be ! As in, each group have a different faction and it would be a PBEM-ACDG?

Archaic said...
Hmmmm......a good point, though I'd think with smaller teams, it'd be easier to get some of the more experienced PBEM players into the gig.

Going to have to agree there... I mean, I do a lot of PBEM games... but this DG just takes up way too much time IMHO which is why I became so inactive.

[Drogue]

The problem with PBEM, is that you have to do orders for one turn, every day or so, or it slows up a lot. I was thinking maybe multi-player IP, done at a set time each week, like turnchat, but smaller map. Although that has it's problems.

[Method]

Originally posted by FlameFlash
That would be ! As in, each group have a different faction and it would be a PBEM-ACDG?

yep. they did that for the civ3 PTW demo game.

anyways, though i'd love to do that, we'd never have enough people. also, RftP is the first MP game i've ever played, so you'd have to explain how the other ways work, drug.

[Maniac]

anyways, though i'd love to do that, we'd never have enough people.

We could always post a thread in the PBEM forums, asking if there is interest in a pbem acdg.

Post 2997.

[ColdWizard]

Originally posted by Drogue
I was thinking maybe multi-player IP, done at a set time each week, like turnchat, but smaller map. Although that has it's problems.

like people not showing up

[Drogue]

True. That is one problem

[FlameFlash]

Originally posted by Maniac


We could always post a thread in the PBEM forums, asking if there is interest in a pbem acdg.

I think that's a good idea... I know I'd be able to be more active if it was a smaller group... this thing stunk of the free-rider problem.

[Hercules]

I favour the idea of teams based on that proposition.

I suppose there would be :
Capitalists
Left/socialists
Green/environmentalists
Fundamentalists
Uncommitted/neutral

[FlameFlash]

/me nods.

That's what I was thinking.

And if we enacted SMAX as well there might be Labor Rights Activists, etc. Though not everybody has SMAX, right?

[Jamski]

It will be hard enough to get enough people, without dragging SMAX into the equation too. Having said that, if each team elects a "democratic dictator" and a deputy then at least there'll always be someone to play the turns, as long as they have the power to act without asking the rest of the team Actually - this would be ideal for Yang in a RP situation. A non-democratic faction I can think of a few peöple thät wöüld be up for that.

/me *WoA shows that he can do it now*

-Jam

[Jamski]

Nearly, eh?