Chironian News Network Issue Five

[Method]

*sigh*
the P4 was nothing like that, and free market economies are not evil (well maybe in their pure form, but such a system doesn't exist). i don't want to start a big arguement again especially since i'm out of parties all together now, but i don't think that is very fair, since it makes the former P4'ers look bad when the party doesn't even exist anymore

i don't have a problem with you printing stuff like that tass, but next time, maybe it could be about still-existing things.

[lucky22]

I'd just like to be on record as chanting in a pro-Gnool rather than anti-spectre-of-the-P4 kind of way.

[Maniac]

If those CCCP'ers would have read our party statement even once, they would realize we standed for a social-democratic free market. I have ranted against multinationals etcetera myself many times.

[DeathByTheSword]

by gones are by gones guys just like my drinkingproblems

[Gnool]

Woohoo, my article created a ruckus (I just came back from a week long ski trip, skiing is fun )

[Darkness' Edge]

TKG: Tass clearly stated that the article was written before the disbandment of P4.

[Mellian]

Originally posted by TKG
*sigh*
the P4 was nothing like that, and free market economies are not evil (well maybe in their pure form, but such a system doesn't exist). i don't want to start a big arguement again especially since i'm out of parties all together now, but i don't think that is very fair, since it makes the former P4'ers look bad when the party doesn't even exist anymore

i don't have a problem with you printing stuff like that tass, but next time, maybe it could be about still-existing things.

Hey, the media always write bad stuff about politicians, it is one of the negative perks of the job

-Mellian

[Hercules]

*Letters Page There's a fair amount of sound thinking coming thru here.
As a believer (so far) in party systems: rather than a grand list of policies to subscribe to, maybe parties, on planet, can build from the ground up. One policy at a time.
For instance TKG and AdamT would seem to have different views on one or two issues. Those views may act a cluster points for fellow members who agree on that issue. Eventually 6-7 members could end up agreeing on 8-9 points and disagreeing on 4-5.

I know there is a core of the faction who favour a free for all in the belief that democracy is secured by a large gathering of individualistic thinkers and thinking. I am not so sure. There is always room for philosphers but doers are better .
Look at Samuel Beckett. Anyway just a thought.

[Archaic]

Originally posted by Darkness' Edge
TKG: Tass clearly stated that the article was written before the disbandment of P4.

No reason he had to print it.

[Method]

exactly. as i said, i wouldn't have a problem with it if the P4 still existed.

[DeathByTheSword]

i dont have a problem with it i even didnt read it.... but it sounds a bit childish to me

[Darkness' Edge]

Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
i dont have a problem with it i even didnt read it.... but it sounds a bit childish to me

Yeah, I agree. It's childish, but it's just part of the game.
If it had been my edition, I probably wouldn't have bothered printing it, ONLY because the P4 had already been disbanded. But otherwise, I can't see why not, and I'm happy to print political propaganda anytime someone bothers writing it.

[Archaic]

So if I write something that demonises you and makes various lies about your ideology, you'll print it, hmmm?

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by Archaic
So if I write something that demonises you and makes various lies about your ideology, you'll print it, hmmm?