Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

P4 policial thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    My response

    Thanks for the response, DBTS. I'd actually prefer to be called the "organizer" rather than "leader" of the EDP, since once the party gets off the ground all members will be equal.

    In response, I'd like to say that I think exploration is something that can be lived by even after we explore the whole planet. Even then, there will still be unsettled areas to fill with bases -- untouched continents, oceans, space (meaning satellites. Granted, in time the EDP would be focusing more on the "Discovery" part of our mission, but thatg doesn't mean there'd be nothing left to explore.

    (If you would rather I not post in your party's thread, I will move or delete this post.)
    Adam T. Gieseler

    Comment


    • #17
      Personally I seldom expand (peacefully) beyond 20 bases. That's why I wouldn't like a huge map as there would be large empty areas between Apolyton and an enemy.
      So after the initial expansion phase Explore isn't a priority at all for me. I don't think longterm cooperation is possible between us.
      Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
      Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

      Comment


      • #18
        ****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****

        i must responsed to what ADAM has said. and say that you are right that we can build the entire ocean full with bases (i have heard prokhor speak of such tech. when in the messhall one day ) but will this be the best way to go....? i do not think so. and for space? this is not really exploration its more gaining new rescourses and gain a tactical high ground. but beside this counter i must again stress that p4 will, in the early years of planetfall, explore the planet. blueprints of a specially designed car, also called rover, are ready. and we will have the unity rovers also, if we can find the pods. but citizens do not stare yourself blind on exploration. think of our livingconditions they can only improve by building our cities.

        ****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****SPECIAL MESSAGE****
        Bunnies!
        Welcome to the DBTSverse!
        God, Allah, boedha, siva, the stars, tealeaves and the palm of you hand. If you are so desperately looking for something to believe in GO FIND A MIRROR
        'Space05us is just a stupid nice guy' - Space05us

        Comment


        • #19
          Beign a builder in most of my games, I'm joining this party too.
          I think that growth and industry are the points to focus at the beginning of our colonization. We must explore and settle cities as quickly as possible to have a good core of cities as soon as possible. But it isn't only temporary and as soon as we finish our expansion phase, I believe that focusing on energy productionis the most important thing to do.
          That's why I propose Democratic/planned at the beginning of our colonization and later Democratic/FM.
          Speaking of morale in the war, I think we must prevent any abrogation of the UN chart and NEVER make any atrocities and ban punition's sphere - Even in war time. I'm sure that our strong economy and industry will help to support war by giving distractions to our people. As a famous Roman's emperor said in our homeworld "Bread and games for the people". But for sure, we will need to control our economy during this war time in order to make restoring order easier by our military forces and to boost industry a bit. I'm pro owning planet busters but only for discouraging the others factions to lauch theirs on our territory. I'm also against any counter-offensive using planet busters, as the planetary council will always make a war resolution against the faction who would be foolish enough to use this kind of weapon.
          Speaking of ideology, I think we should lean toward wealth and eudomenia to boost our economy, growth and industry to make it the best in Planet. With money, we will do what we want and will be very helpfull to obtain voices in the Planetary council and perhaps technologies from Zakarov, if we aren't already ahead.
          Member of the P4 party in the SMAC democracy game
          Running for foreign affairs

          Comment


          • #20
            we dont need (really) eudaimonia if we have market. instead i'd use cybernetic for the efficiency and research bump (planet too if we're in market)

            Comment


            • #21
              i see there are some discussionspoint on future/ and the atrocities....I think we have to ask maniac, as partyfounder how he wants to form democratic desiscions in the party....

              also i want to welcome TKG and Juliennew to p4
              Bunnies!
              Welcome to the DBTSverse!
              God, Allah, boedha, siva, the stars, tealeaves and the palm of you hand. If you are so desperately looking for something to believe in GO FIND A MIRROR
              'Space05us is just a stupid nice guy' - Space05us

              Comment


              • #22
                Man I just wrote a large reply when I accidently clicked the wrong button and it was all erased. I'll try and summarize it.

                First, since we only have four members, for now we can keep discussing in this thread. The majority wins of course. If we become a very large party with dozens of members (who knows if this demo game becomes a succes) we might open seperate discussion threads for different topics. After discussion has taken place, a poll thread will be opened. Besides voting on their preferred option, they will have to post what they voted in the thread. Without further reasoning or discussion of course. That was in the other thread. The reason votes can't be done in secret is to prevent non-party members to influence the party policy.

                Under the hypothetical situation that are our party would grow to have more than ten members, we will have to keep seperate party elections, parallel with the factionwide ones. These will decide who of our party will try to run for commissionerate and directorate. That core group of democratically elected could also decide party policy if there wouldn't be a clear majority about a subject.

                About the atrocity discussion.
                Both Juliennew and DBTS agree on building but not necessarily using PBs. Then I will of course follow that policy.
                We also all agree to not commit atrocities while the UN Charter is on to prevent economic consequences. May I further propose to not seek to lift the charter? That way we don't need to discuss atrocities right now. (Just preventing an inner party confict )

                That leaves the issue of punishment spheres. Juliennew, I don't suggest building punishment spheres on a regular basis. I would just like to build one in one size one base. To keep it size 1, the first citizen will be made a specialist. The base would be a prison for criminals. It could be called Poly Troll Penal Colony. The prisoners won't undergo sphere treatment on a regular basis of course. It would just be a means of deterrence, to create cooperation from the prisoners. Only the troublemakers would undergo treatment. Is such limited use of the punishment sphere ok for you, Juliennew? That base could also use the prisoners as forced labourers to build an energy park.

                On SE, I mostly use the following combinations. Early on Demo/Planned/Wealth. Normally I don't use Democracy early on because of the -2 Support. But because the PKs have an efficiency penalty, it seems necessary here. Later I would switch to Demo/FM/Wealth-Knowledge. In the end-game I use Demo/Green/Knowledge/Eudaimonic.
                FM/Cybernetic is as fine as Green/Eudaimonic. We always get the +2 Eco so essential for our builder party.
                The difference is the FM/Cybernetic combination gives three boni and two mali, while Green/Eudaimonic gives four boni and one malus.
                Last edited by Maniac; August 5, 2002, 18:23.
                Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
                Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

                Comment


                • #23
                  TKG and Juliennew, what directorates would you prefer? DBTS is running for High Commissioner and I would love to become Director of Terraformation and/or Colonization.
                  Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
                  Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    I would like to race for foreign affairs. With this directorate held by the P4, we will ensure that commerce with the others factions will the more efficient possible and will prevent that a mad gunman destroy our commercial income by entering a war that the P4 don't want.
                    I would also lean toward especially good relations with Morgan and Zhakarov.
                    Member of the P4 party in the SMAC democracy game
                    Running for foreign affairs

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Good luck! You'll need as I think there are already two other candidates for that function.
                      Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
                      Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        We should have someone running for the city planner election as it is our main concern.

                        I'm OK for the jail's base but I hope we won't need it.
                        We should also make a general policy speech to clarify our policy on some subjects.
                        Last edited by Juliennew; August 5, 2002, 19:36.
                        Member of the P4 party in the SMAC democracy game
                        Running for foreign affairs

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          i'd like to be science minister or the SE and energy rate guy (if there is one)

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by M@ni@c
                            The difference is the FM/Cybernetic combination gives three boni and two mali, while Green/Eudaimonic gives four boni and one malus.
                            true, but you dont get the +2 research. if we get the backbone (no more police penalty) and if we're in market, it doesn't matter anyways .

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Good luck TKG.
                              Member of the P4 party in the SMAC democracy game
                              Running for foreign affairs

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Here is the SE choice I would support during peacetime : Demo/FM/Wealth/Eudémonia
                                Here are the stats that it gives :
                                Efficiency +1 / Growth +4 / Economy +5!!(+1 energy/square - +4 energy/base - +3 commerce rate) / Industry +3 / Support -3 / Police -5 / Planet -3 / Morale -2

                                I will support this SE excepted during expansion phase and war time : I will support planned economy to remove the police's problem
                                I could also support cybernetic if we build the "Network's heart" that removes the cybernetic's malus.

                                What do you think ?
                                Member of the P4 party in the SMAC democracy game
                                Running for foreign affairs

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X