Excuse me but what the hell is this?

[Trithemius]

Originally posted by Voltaire
Did PEACE say they recognized your claim?

To my knowledge PEACE has avoided this issue as much as is possible; insofar as it seems to be substantial devoid of content.

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by Voltaire
Did PEACE say they recognized your claim?

That is entirely irrelevant. They were forced to recognise our claim, however they feel about it.

[Voltaire]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
That is entirely irrelevant. They were forced to recognise our claim, however they feel about it.

Perhaps, but you're missing the most important point of all, we don't recognize your claim, that's what really matters, isn't it?

[FlameFlash]

Originally posted by Voltaire

Perhaps, but you're missing the most important point of all, we don't recognize your claim, that's what really matters, isn't it?

Then why bring us up at all!?

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by Voltaire
Perhaps, but you're missing the most important point of all, we don't recognize your claim, that's what really matters, isn't it?

No, no it isn't. CPU opinion is what matters, as it is us who will decide how to react to this Hive aggression.

[Trithemius]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns No, no it isn't. CPU opinion is what matters, as it is us who will decide how to react to this Hive aggression.

It is my hope that this remark heralds a change in CPU policy - namely that they will punish the party they feel is responsible for alleged trangressions instead of punishing PEACE.

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by Trithemius
It is my hope that this remark heralds a change in CPU policy - namely that they will punish the party they feel is responsible for alleged trangressions instead of punishing PEACE.

Touche.

[Voltaire]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
No, no it isn't. CPU opinion is what matters, as it is us who will decide how to react to this Hive aggression.

Fair enough, the ball is now in your court.

[Trithemius]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Touche.

Thanks , and you respected the Quoting Tradition

[Skanky Burns]

Originally posted by Trithemius
Thanks , but you neglected the Quoting Tradition

You will pay for your baseless accusation.
Where there's an edit, theres a way.

[Voltaire]

I would like to for the record state that all and everything I say in the main forum unless explicitly indicated to be official does not reflect the opinion of the Human Hive as a whole (as many of you may already have observed). Furthermore I would also like to state that it does not always reflect my opinions either, in fact it seldom does, it is role playing, we’re the Hive and well we might as well make the most of it. I hope that it is understood as such and not misconstrued. In the future I shall be more careful about my words so that they cannot be misconstrued.

Thank you

[Trithemius]

Originally posted by Skanky Burns
You will pay for your baseless accusation.

I thought baseless accusations were the order of the day, sorry.

Where there's an edit, theres a way.

Amen!

[Trithemius]

Originally posted by Voltaire
I would like to for the record state that all and everything I say in the main forum unless explicitly indicated to be official does not reflect the opinion of the Human Hive as a whole (as many of you may already have observed). Furthermore I would also like to state that it does not always reflect my opinions either, in fact it seldom does, it is role playing, we’re the Hive and well we might as well make the most of it. I hope that it is understood as such and not misconstrued. In the future I shall be more careful about my words so that they cannot be misconstrued.

Thank you

It would be a lot easier if the things you say did reflect Human Hive policy. That way we would actually be able to determine what Hive policy was instead of having to mentally check ourselves and remember that statements from the Human Hive Chairperson for some reason do not reflect Human Hive policy.

If this habit of issuing non-statements is a concerted campaign to confuse (and eventually irritate) people then I must say that it has had resounding success, at least with me.

[Frankychan]

We speak for ourselves (amazingly).

But when it's matters of seriousness, then one of us will make it clear that he/she speaks for the Hive as a whole.

[Voltaire]

Originally posted by Trithemius
It would be a lot easier if the things you say did reflect Human Hive policy. That way we would actually be able to determine what Hive policy was instead of having to mentally check ourselves and remember that statements from the Human Hive Chairperson for some reason do not reflect Human Hive policy.

If this habit of issuing non-statements is a concerted campaign to confuse (and eventually irritate) people then I must say that it has had resounding success, at least with me.

You give us way too much credit, we're not that organized.