Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Three new reviews. (Aug 5)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Three new reviews. (Aug 5)

    The worst news in the review is that you can no longer rename cities. Did the Civ5 team never play civ? WTF? You could always rename cities and I almost always renamed my cities.

    Eurogamer
    I, like many others, have been playing Civilization games for well over a decade. Over this time I've developed several…


    Kotaku
    This preview of Civilization V is incomplete. It takes more than nine Earth hours, you see, for the great Arabian empire — land of Mecca, Rio De Janeiro and Beijing — to assume dominance of the globe.


    Joystiq
    Find in-depth gaming news and hands-on reviews of the latest video games, video consoles and accessories.
    Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

  • #2
    Yup, it's CivRev for the PC.
    “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
    "Capitalism ho!"

    Comment


    • #3
      You can't rename cities?

      I like a lot of what I've heard about CivV but that is a bizarre feature to take out. A great fun simple thing people love.
      Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
      Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
      We've got both kinds

      Comment


      • #4
        From Eurogamer review

        forever proud of building the Sistine Chapel, yet somehow blind to the starving millions.
        What a great summary of almost all world leaders EVER.
        Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
        Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
        We've got both kinds

        Comment


        • #5
          Generally I find Eurogamer reviews to be pretty accurate and reflective of what I think, and after reading that I am quite pleasantly excited again!
          Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
          Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
          We've got both kinds

          Comment


          • #6
            hrmm...

            How do you "accidentally" attack the Ottomans?
            I don't know what I've been told!
            Deirdre's got a Network Node!
            Love to press the Buster Switch!
            Gonna nuke that crazy witch!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by gdijedi7 View Post
              hrmm...

              How do you "accidentally" attack the Ottomans?
              You make a mis-click somewhere or you attack someone else who had an alliance with the Ottomans you were unaware of. We are now aware of secret alliances ...

              (I haven't read the article yet)

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Oerdin View Post
                The worst news in the review is that you can no longer rename cities. Did the Civ5 team never play civ? WTF? You could always rename cities and I almost always renamed my cities.
                If this is THE WORST news, then it must be AMAZING game. I mean, I never EVER rename cities.
                The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so
                certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
                -- Bertrand Russell

                Comment


                • #9
                  A great feature, or more likely bug, of Civ2 was the way you could use a diplomat to investigate an enemy city and then rename it. Sure, it was tactically useless and a waste of a diplomat to rename "Persepolis" to "Isuckballs," but it was fun. It was fun.

                  EDIT: I'm inclined to be very suspicious of any reviewer who thinks HP are "new to Civ."
                  Last edited by Elok; August 6, 2010, 22:12.
                  1011 1100
                  Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    If this is THE WORST news, then it must be AMAZING game. I mean, I never EVER rename cities.
                    On the other hand, I ALWAYS rename cities. I can't stand founding a city named 'Paris' or 'Moscow' or 'London'. Blegh. How boring. But hey, to each their own! My dad hardly ever renamed cities, either. (Until he started playing with me and saw my naming patterns.)

                    It's not the WORST news, but I can't judge that this is a good game by reading other peoples' reviews. I have to build my own judgment based on facts from the articles. I could care less if someone who's never played CIV thinks version 5 is a great game. They can shove it. I just had several hours of driving, which included some time to contemplate CIV5. I can't imagine WTF is going through the heads of the development team when they remove an expected feature like this. It adds to the replayability and customizability of the game for me (and I'm sure I'm not alone.) How hard can it be to do city names the CIV4 way? Is something broken in the gameplay by allowing players to name their own cities? I didn't realize this was a request of many civvers.

                    Firaxis marketing associate Pete Murray offered. "There's always something you can take to that fundamental formula and change it, and say, 'Okay, what can we do that's new and exciting with combat? What can we do that's new and exciting with culture? Diplomacy?'"
                    Oooh! Something new, I've got something new and exciting for gameplay! Let's remove a feature of CIV that people have counted on for years! That will help!

                    I'm definitely in the 'wait' column...the odds of me doing a pre-order, even for neat pewter collectibles, are slim at this point.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As far as renaming cities...

                      I suspect it's not so much a matter of removing the feature as they forgot to put it in or haven't gotten around to it yet. It'll be a pretty simple thing to add. Won't surprise me at all if it gets added by launch or shortly after.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Elok View Post

                        EDIT: I'm inclined to be very suspicious of any reviewer who thinks HP are "new to Civ."
                        Yeah, that Kotaku review was horrible. I get the feeling the reviewer would have been rather playing something else, but knew this was popular so he figured he better pretend to like it.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Oerdin View Post
                          The worst news in the review is that you can no longer rename cities. Did the Civ5 team never play civ? WTF? You could always rename cities and I almost always renamed my cities.
                          Yes, not allowing that is really retarded.
                          Clash of Civilization team member
                          (a civ-like game whose goal is low micromanagement and good AI)
                          web site http://clash.apolyton.net/frame/index.shtml and forum here on apolyton)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I love renaming cities

                            I was playing a game with a friend once and he named all his cities after silicon valley companies. I will never forget that time he had a "slave revolt at Google".
                            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                            ){ :|:& };:

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X