Well, I hate to be the lone dissenter, but Civ 3 has been a big disappointment so far. The medium map just seems to be too small...on the supposedly easy Warlord level I just can't get enough cities established soon enough without being crowded and having to resort to warfare. Sorry, but if I wanted a war game I would have chosen Duke Nukem or some other adolescent fare. I'm only interested in scientific and cultural victories. I've had some success on the larger map, but the game runs excruciatingly slow....and don't tell me I need a faster computer...I've got a 600 Mhz iMac with 128 Megs of RAM and any game that requires more than that shouldn't be on the market. Is this just a Mac bug, or are others experiencing the same problems?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
About to throw in the towel
Collapse
X
-
I think you should not look up the General forum, but rather the Strategy forum. There are some good threads on how to play this game.
My recommendation:
http://apolyton.net/forums/showthrea...threadid=37122
Comment
-
if civIII is your first sid meiers game you will probably find it challenging... i started playing the civ series geez about 7 years ago? i dunno but right after the first civilization game came out. i was pretty young and had nothing else better to do so i played many many hours a day... along with other civ games, that gives me a whole lot of experience coming into CIV3... and i found civ3 challenging for months until i've gotten a hold of it...
my point.... this isn't Quake or DOOM it's a different class of game.... i would to a point term it to be a 'highbrow' game whereas the others are more of a lowbrow sort....
stick with CIV3 you will get a hold of it, or perhaps it just wasn't meant to be. i hear counterstrike is a good one, you may want to look it up
Comment
-
I've already tossed the towel on this one. I just came back to see if there was any word on when the next patch might be out so I might try this turkey again. I'll give these bozos one last try with another patch.... assuming they are working on another patch, which they don't actually seem to be saying.
I've played Sid games since I discovered Civ 1. The game play might be ok on this one, but its hard to tell because the stupid game keeps crashing my computer. The only software I've loaded that can crash the whole XP operating system. BARRRRF! Not to mention I still can't believe they stripped multiplayer out of this release, so I can't try out the game system against anything but the Artificial Stupid.
I'm about to uninstall the whole turkey and go back to playing SMAC. Funny how it was written years before XP, but it runs fine. But the software that was written during the time when MS was releasing Beta versions of XP and info on XP crashes the whole operating system.
IF YOU HAVEN'T GIVEN FIRAXIS YOUR MONEY YET.....DON'T BUY THIS GAME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At least make them fix the turkey from its 'rush-it-out-the-door-to-snare-the-xmas-suckers' state its in now.Fear not the path of truth for the lack of others walking it.
Comment
-
No, this isn't my first Civ game. I was pretty good at Civ2, and could win a science victory almost every time at the Emperor level. The problem isn't with my strategy; the problem is Civ3's sluggishness on the larger maps. I keep getting these "please wait" messages while the computer players make their moves, and it takes longer and longer the more units they build. There are plenty of other irritants too; when a city is in civil disorder, the message is so tiny it's easy to overlook it until the rioters destroy a temple; unless I fill in the queue the city starts building units I don't want or need; and most aggravating of all, I get no warning before other other civs build Wonders and no way to speed them up. It's easy for even the best player to waste dozens of shields.
As much as I hate to admit it, this games is shaping up as the biggest disappointment since Sim City 3000.
Originally posted by DaXX
if civIII is your first sid meiers game you will probably find it challenging... i started playing the civ series geez about 7 years ago? i dunno but right after the first civilization game came out. i was pretty young and had nothing else better to do so i played many many hours a day... along with other civ games, that gives me a whole lot of experience coming into CIV3... and i found civ3 challenging for months until i've gotten a hold of it...
my point.... this isn't Quake or DOOM it's a different class of game.... i would to a point term it to be a 'highbrow' game whereas the others are more of a lowbrow sort....
stick with CIV3 you will get a hold of it, or perhaps it just wasn't meant to be. i hear counterstrike is a good one, you may want to look it up
Comment
-
why is there no documentation on that the end of the game is 2050? After several games I get the message that the game terminates in 2050 and I have just got to the modern age and starting to progress. Consistently the other civilizations overtake mine, which I realize is my lack of skill to develop quickly and smartly, but for a beginner to get the feel and satisfaction from the game why is this limit of 2050 not moveable!
Brian
Comment
-
I Have a G4 with 256 memory and a Atlhon 1.4 GHZ with 512RAM with a 64M video card and in the Giga and Huge Maps still Kaput ( )Traigo sueños, tristezas, alegrÃas, mansedumbres, democracias quebradas como cántaros,
religiones mohosas hasta el alma...
Comment
-
Originally posted by bobbyd1947
There are plenty of other irritants too; when a city is in civil disorder, the message is so tiny it's easy to overlook it until the rioters destroy a temple; unless I fill in the queue the city starts building units I don't want or need; and most aggravating of all, I get no warning before other other civs build Wonders...
Money isn't everything, but it's very useful.
Comment
-
Re: About to throw in the towel
Originally posted by bobbyd1947
Well, I hate to be the lone dissenter, but Civ 3 has been a big disappointment so far. . .
Comment
-
I'm running a p2-400 and I only like playing on huge maps. In late game, I click 'End turn' and go make a cup of tea, fold clothes, take garbage out, or any number of other activities while the turn is being processed. Most games usually take about a week.
Interestingly, the general level of tidiness where I live depends on whether it's early or late game.There's no game in The Sims. It's not a game. It's like watching a tank of goldfishes and feed them occasionally. - Urban Ranger
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qilue
I'm running a p2-400 and I only like playing on huge maps. In late game, I click 'End turn' and go make a cup of tea, fold clothes, take garbage out, or any number of other activities while the turn is being processed. Most games usually take about a week.
Interestingly, the general level of tidiness where I live depends on whether it's early or late game.
I can agree with thatDon't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!
Comment
-
I've got a 600 Mhz iMac with 128 Megs of RAM and any game that requires more than that shouldn't be on the market.
As for the strategy problems, keep playing. If this is your first of these games (CIV, CIV2, SMAC/SMACX) its worth the effort.Last edited by SpencerH; March 14, 2002, 16:15.We need seperate human-only games for MP/PBEM that dont include the over-simplifications required to have a good AI
If any man be thirsty, let him come unto me and drink. Vampire 7:37
Just one old soldiers opinion. E Tenebris Lux. Pax quaeritur bello.
Comment
Comment