The main reasons I did not like Civ. 3 were the following:
1. In order to keep up woth the computer I had to build a galizion cities or keep going to war. What I liked in civ 2 was that I could build 5-6 cities on normal, small map, try not to go to war unless it was inevitable and go to war late at the game, where I would face a nice challenge. In civ3 the computer builds cities EVERYWHERE and with no logic. I hate having to use the same tactic. However, If I dont build cities constantly or go to war (which I hate) I get too much behind and loose. Any changes for the better in conquests OR any tools to limit that (i.e the co\pu building infinite cities??)??
2. Corruption: From what I read there are now specialists and city improvemnets that make the game better. Your experience?
I have PTW and did not like it. Should I buy conquests??? It is not a matter of cost, I just hate to get games and not play them.
Thanks
Apostolos
PLease respond to am59@ath.forthnet.gr
1. In order to keep up woth the computer I had to build a galizion cities or keep going to war. What I liked in civ 2 was that I could build 5-6 cities on normal, small map, try not to go to war unless it was inevitable and go to war late at the game, where I would face a nice challenge. In civ3 the computer builds cities EVERYWHERE and with no logic. I hate having to use the same tactic. However, If I dont build cities constantly or go to war (which I hate) I get too much behind and loose. Any changes for the better in conquests OR any tools to limit that (i.e the co\pu building infinite cities??)??
2. Corruption: From what I read there are now specialists and city improvemnets that make the game better. Your experience?
I have PTW and did not like it. Should I buy conquests??? It is not a matter of cost, I just hate to get games and not play them.
Thanks
Apostolos
PLease respond to am59@ath.forthnet.gr
Comment