Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conquests: is it worth it?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Conquests: is it worth it?

    A simple question meets with simple answers.

    If you have not bought it yet, just watch the poll.
    81
    Yes
    90.12%
    73
    No
    9.88%
    8

  • #2
    I definately think conquests is worth it.
    signature not visible until patch comes out.

    Comment


    • #3
      IMHO...this is a revitalization for Civ 3.

      For that alone it is worth it. And there are all the additions.

      Asmodean
      Im not sure what Baruk Khazad is , but if they speak Judeo-Dwarvish, that would be "blessed are the dwarves" - lord of the mark

      Comment


      • #4
        Hell yeah

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm proud to have cast the 12th YES bringing the score 12 YES to 0 NO.

          No doubt, this is the real thing.
          Haven't been here for ages....

          Comment


          • #6
            Dude if this game eats up any more of my time I'm hosed. It's definitely worth it, like 10 times better than PTW.

            Comment


            • #7
              yes

              Comment


              • #8
                Yep. Particularly when you consider the Sengoku Japan Conquest is a new 540 turn, full unit, full tech tree, free standing civ game by itself.
                "Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription is ... more cow bell!"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Yes. Civ3.2 is the best yet. If you complain about corruption a lot you may want to wait for the 1st patch, or order from Amazon.com and your shipment will arrive sometime after the next patch is released.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think the Middle Ages scenario has a lot to say for itself too (particularly with the "forbidden" techs belonging to each culture), but the most time probably went into Sengoku, yes.

                    Honestly, I like all the expansions, except maybe Napolean and WWII, but that's because I'm an aggressive builder at heart and those two are pretty heavily warmonger scenarios allowing for very little building.
                    Friedrich Psitalon
                    Admin, Civ4Players Ladder
                    Consultant, Firaxis Games

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Fried-Psitalon
                      I think the Middle Ages scenario has a lot to say for itself too (particularly with the "forbidden" techs belonging to each culture), but the most time probably went into Sengoku, yes.

                      Honestly, I like all the expansions, except maybe Napolean and WWII, but that's because I'm an aggressive builder at heart and those two are pretty heavily warmonger scenarios allowing for very little building.
                      If you play Middle Ages as Vikings, your best strategy is to warmonger...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        yes, but I still would have preferred the days when expansions only costed $20 instead of $30.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Dissident
                          yes, but I still would have preferred the days when expansions only costed $20 instead of $30.
                          The upcoming premium expansion for Galactic Civilizations wil cost only $20.

                          Yet another example of why I like Stardock so much

                          Asmodean
                          Im not sure what Baruk Khazad is , but if they speak Judeo-Dwarvish, that would be "blessed are the dwarves" - lord of the mark

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Absolutley
                            I have walked since the dawn of time and were ever I walk, death is sure to follow. As surely as night follows day.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              yes, but I still would have preferred the days when expansions only costed $20 instead of $30.


                              well, I prefered my beer to be 10 cents too, but eh.

                              Maybe you change your nick to grandpaw Simpson , what che think?
                              PC games are cheap (depending on how much you play them of course), but in thruth, the Civ serie is more then likely to be cheapest thing in the house and certainly the cheapest pass-time/hobby of them all.
                              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                              Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X