Henrik's post doesn't argue against the ICS, but it does accuse FreeCiv of not rewarding any other strategy with satisfactory game play.
One of the gems of Civ2 is the large number of differing strategies that can be used to win from ICS to OCC. Can FreeCiv be won using a low-city-count perfectionist approach?
The AI you describe, Harry, has the potential to be a much improved adversary in scenarios. That and the improved language are very attractive. How many people have played it? Is there a core of regulars?
One of the gems of Civ2 is the large number of differing strategies that can be used to win from ICS to OCC. Can FreeCiv be won using a low-city-count perfectionist approach?
The AI you describe, Harry, has the potential to be a much improved adversary in scenarios. That and the improved language are very attractive. How many people have played it? Is there a core of regulars?
Comment