Modern Unit Graphics

[Broken_Erika]

the russian built chiornyoriol is better, but i doubt that the russians could afford to put the thing into production,

[cousarmy0001]

i disagree. the Merkava is a much better looking tank :-)

i believe the Merkava Mk4 uses chobham armor. from what i've seen on the Chiorny Oriol, it's got the latest version of Russian reactive armor (incidentally, an idea they copied from the Isrealis), which many non-experts believe can defeat any projectile fired by the 120mm gun on the Abrams or Merkava.

it might be able to. once, anyway. that's the problem with reactive armor- once a brick is hit, the armor is weaker until said brick is replaced.

and any infantry hanging around outside is pretty screwed.

that being said, the Chiorny Oriol might be better than the Abrams or Merkava, though. the Russians tend to be about 30 years behind our stuff technology-wise, and both the Abrams and Merkava came out in the very early '80s, so they're both a good 20 years older than this.

sorry for the essay. maybe i should throw a unit in here to justify this whole thing....

[typhoon]

Originally posted by our_man
I'm not sure if any of these are a Merkava are not, but it's a good collection of Israeli armour.

Out of curiosity, what's it for?

The compilation is of various fairline and tanelorn units, most recoloured by catfish, some by me. The excellent Merkava now being flaunted on this thread is by Catfish, and the ****ty Magach is mine. It was put together for an update of Under Siege, which never materialised.

I'd appreciate it if you actually credit tanelorn, fairline, and catfish, since the lion's share was their efforts, instead of trying to pass it off as someone else's.

(Practicing what I preach: Case, fairline, tanelorn, and jimmywax. Their work, not mine.)

That being said...

[curtsibling]

It's kind of funny when we all compare these armour designs in capability...

As the chances of Russian/Israeli/American forces actually being face-to-face in combat is about 0%!

[our_man]

I'd appreciate it if you actually credit tanelorn, fairline, and catfish, since the lion's share was their efforts, instead of trying to pass it off as someone else's.

Was that comment directed at me? If so, could you explain why? I did not try to pass it off as 'someone else's, and I resent this insinuation.

The units remain exactly the same as they were when I downloaded them months ago; I did not alter the signatures in any way. The signatures of Fairline, Catfish and Tanelorn can clearly be seen, as can those of Jimmywax and Nemo, among others.

[typhoon]

Originally posted by our_man


Was that comment directed at me?

You noticed then.

If so, could you explain why? I did not try to pass it off as 'someone else's, and I resent this insinuation.

It's a common courtesy to credit the orignal source of the units which you post. Failure to do so implies that they are yours, even if this is not stated unequivocally. If the name happens to elude you, it should always be made clear that it is another's work.

Resent any insinuation that you choose to make of it. People have gotten their arses bitten off because of these minor omissions in the past and if you'd care to join their ranks I really have no objection.

[our_man]

It's a common courtesy to credit the orignal source of the units which you post. Failure to do so implies that they are yours, even if this is not stated unequivocally. If the name happens to elude you, it should always be made clear that it is another's work.

Check my message again. Did I say 'my collection'. No. I said 'a collection'. If you noticed when people have posted compilations before in this and other threads, the names of the authors have not been mentioned either. Take a look at the image file. They're at least 7 different authors; I think (and I believe most people would agree with me) that it would be a bit excessive to list them. How do you decide who gets listed and who doesn't? You neglected to mention Nemo yourself - why? His signature is on quite a few of them, and as he was around before most of the other authors it's safe to assume that the basic design of that image was his, with others modifying it.

Resent any insinuation that you choose to make of it. People have gotten their arses bitten off because of these minor omissions in the past and if you'd care to join their ranks I really have no objection.

A good thing you're all bark then and no bite.

Let's be honest, I wouldn't really care about this except for the fact that you accused me of trying to pass these off as my own. I've been around a lot longer than you kid, and I'd like to think by now the members of the SLeague would know the only work I take credit for is my own.

[typhoon]

Check my message again. Did I say 'my collection'. No. I said 'a collection'. If you noticed when people have posted compilations before in this and other threads, the names of the authors have not been mentioned either.

This doesn't neccessarily make them right. As mentioned before, this is a touchy issue and some have gotten their arses bitten off on account of it- never by me though (which is what you seem to have incorrectly assumed.) I'm not going to mention names but it has happened before.

You neglected to mention Nemo yourself - why? His signature is on quite a few of them, and as he was around before most of the other authors it's safe to assume that the basic design of that image was his, with others modifying it.

Must have missed that. His work so great and pervasive that sometimes I confess that I take him for granted, and mention only the most recent pair of hands that they have gone through. Put him down as well.

They're at least 7 different authors; I think (and I believe most people would agree with me) that it would be a bit excessive to list them. How do you decide who gets listed and who doesn't?

That debate has happened before, with inconclusive results. It is conceded that to do so may not be worth all that effort, as some have argued. Personally I make every effort to credit every source of the work on which I build on. I take my cue from compilations by Curt and Steph- they go through great pains to ensure that credit's where it's due. If they aren't good enough role models, who is?

As I see it, however, this point is moot since nowhere in your post is anyone credited at all. I'm sorry, but changing the topic isn't helping you too much.

Let's be honest, I wouldn't really care about this except for the fact that you accused me of trying to pass these off as my own.

And see, I wouldn't have bothered with this lamblasting if you had mentioned where they had come from.

I've been around a lot longer than you kid, and I'd like to think by now the members of the SLeague would know the only work I take credit for is my own.

Not trying to bring your reputation into question at all, just pointing out a few things that will make Poly a friendlier place.

[typhoon]

PS: this debate is wasting valuble thread space. I'd suggest you send your reply through PM.

[our_man]

PS: this debate is wasting valuble thread space. I'd suggest you send your reply through PM.

For someone who wants to make Poly a friendlier place, I've never had such a personal attack on my character by any other member. Learn a bit of diplomacy kid. I don't think we've anything left to say to each other. PM if you want, but don't hold your breath waiting for a reply.

For my own future reference though, I'd like ask the authors of the units who are still around - who should go down as the authors in a post? Despite typhoon claiming my point was moot , I think it's quite relevant. As some of you will know, the previous times I have posted units of someone else, they have belonged to one author (fairline), and I did credit him. If there is a compilation of units with several authors, I'm not going to list each and every author. And guess what? Looking back over other compilations, no-one else does either. God knows why I have been singled out by typhoon, as he's never made an issue of it before with anyone else . The funny thing is that this is one of the few times I've ever posted other people's units to help someone out.

I understand don't want to answer this question and become embroiled in an argument, but if you feel you can add something constructive to help clarify to me what is the accepted etiquette, please do. I will respect your opinion.

The best thing would be if everyone with their initials on the image file could tell me whether I should have mentioned them by name when I put the units down. To stop cluttering the thread, could you PM me your answer?

Would it be possible for the mods to delete the previous posts of the 'discussion' but leave this one for 2-3 days, until the artists have had enough time to see it and respond to my query? Thanks.

[techumseh]

Hold on, guys. This is getting a bit out of hand. First of all, it's possible to take the authorship issue a little too seriously. Sigs do get dropped, mainly because some folks still use the Civ2 ingame editor, which resets the pink/purple background diamonds automatically.

And sometimes mistakes are made in an attempt to correct this. For example, I just found a unit by Curt which had Fairline's sig on it, in a collection by a well respected third SL member.

The etiquette in these situations should be: 1) always assume that the mistake is inadvertent, and 2) contact the person who has made the mistake privately and ask for a correction. Remember, people are almost always trying to make a contribution to the community when they post stuff here, regardless if it's their own work or someone else's.

[Art of War]

Originally posted by curtsibling
It's kind of funny when we all compare these armour designs in capability...

As the chances of Russian/Israeli/American forces actually being face-to-face in combat is about 0%!

it's fun though!


anyway, new Merkava is also reported to possibly boast a 140mm cannon.

[cousarmy0001]

the chances of the Isrealis ending up facing Russian built armor is a much greater possibility, though.

[Broken_Erika]

Originally posted by Art of War


it's fun though!


anyway, new Merkava is also reported to possibly boast a 140mm cannon.

i hear of new chinese aromr with 150mm gun,

[cousarmy0001]

as was proven with the 120mm smoothbore currently in use with the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard 2, Merkava Mk4, and a whole bunch more, and was also proven with the 105mm gun that was on the M60A3, Merkava Mk1-3, Leopard 1, original production Abrams, Chieftan, etc etc, it's not necessarily the caliber that matters.

the 120mm gun far outclassed the 125mm and larger guns used on Soviet bloc MBTs, despite the competition being of a larger caliber.