Tweet
Lets release the dogs of war 
-
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta -
Con does that mean you're in?
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.Comment
-
Let's do this as a draft. Unless anyone objects, I nominate Wittlich and Makahlua to select players for their teams. It will be a straight order draft snaking the last round.
1.1 Makahlua
1.2 Wittlich
2.1 Makahlua
2.2 Wittlich
3.1 Wittlich
3.2 Makahlua
for the picks. Go ahead and pick at your will (just post here, copy my thread over).<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.Comment
-
Oops, only now found this invitation.
But it's no use for me to start a new pitboss this week. I'm on vacation next week so...Comment
-
For Balderdashing of course.Originally posted by snoopy369
Con does that mean you're in?
To make fun of Beta mostly
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Well it can wait a week to start, my guess is it will anywayOriginally posted by GeoModder
Oops, only now found this invitation.
But it's no use for me to start a new pitboss this week. I'm on vacation next week so...
3 on 3 on 3, or try to find a 10th for 5 on 5 - both are fine to me. 3v3v3 we would have to agree to have no alliances (that degrades very quickly to 6 on 3 otherwise inevitably).<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.Comment
-
I would vote for 5 on 5. The 3 vs 3 vs 3 just doesn't make much sense. If it can't be 6 vs 3, then who would want to start a war. The other team could simply sit back and relax.Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war .... aw, forget that nonsense. Beer, please.Comment
-
Come and get sum, you puppy!Originally posted by conmcb25
To make fun of Beta mostly
Attached FilesCry havoc and let slip the dogs of war .... aw, forget that nonsense. Beer, please.Comment
-
-
"Always War" pretty much ensures thatOriginally posted by Beta
I would vote for 5 on 5. The 3 vs 3 vs 3 just doesn't make much sense. If it can't be 6 vs 3, then who would want to start a war. The other team could simply sit back and relax.
5v5 is fine if we can get one more player...
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.Comment
-
Am I the 9th or the 10th participant?Comment
-
You're the 9th participant
<Reverend> IRC is just multiplayer notepad.
I like your SNOOPY POSTER! - While you Wait quote.Comment
-
Teams should be balanced, more or less, so that we won't end up with a weak team against a strong one
Comment
-
I'm easy with any set up, just thought to suggest one. Besides 4x4 or 5x5 it does sounds interesting indeedOriginally posted by snoopy369
Well, feel free to start your own two player team game I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by the action (and comedy) of a two team 4 player per team game.
Comment
-
I have no problem to wait.Originally posted by GeoModder
Oops, only now found this invitation.
But it's no use for me to start a new pitboss this week. I'm on vacation next week so...Comment
-
me tooOriginally posted by Keygen
I have no problem to wait.
Comment
Comment