Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Civ should be about nations, not collections of cities

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by cyclotron7
    If that is so, than would you admit that any history oriented game is Civ? You didn't mention anything about RTS or TBS, or FPS or RPG for that matter...
    Then, by your own definition, Master of Magic is clearly a Civ game. So is Warlords III.
    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Urban Ranger
      Not necessarily. The idea of Civ is not micromanaging cities, but to build a civilisation that can stand the test of time.
      No, that's the catch phrase on the box. There's a big difference between the core idea of a game and what is written on the cd case.

      Then, by your own definition, Master of Magic is clearly a Civ game. So is Warlords III.
      Screw that, I've never even played those games. You know very well what I mean.

      To be honest, this discussion was so long ago that I don't even remember exactly what we were dicussing. If it had been more current perhaps I could have given you a better reply.
      Lime roots and treachery!
      "Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten

      Comment

      Working...
      X