Which is better? I used to be pacifist for the doubling of the great dudes, especially if I've built the Statue. And I like being pacifist when I'm in mercantilism.
But lately I've been thinking that free religion is better, esp. if you have multiple religions. If I'm right, then is it advantageous to have at least one monastery for every religion in your civ, so that you can spread it late in the game for the extra happy dude? The other advantage of free religion, of course, is that if you get attacked and have to fight a war, you have more time to conclude the war. If you're not spiritual, you don't have to spend a turn in anarchy. Plus, late in the game, it takes so doggone long to build your great dudes that designing your strategy around them seems iffy.
Thoughts?
But lately I've been thinking that free religion is better, esp. if you have multiple religions. If I'm right, then is it advantageous to have at least one monastery for every religion in your civ, so that you can spread it late in the game for the extra happy dude? The other advantage of free religion, of course, is that if you get attacked and have to fight a war, you have more time to conclude the war. If you're not spiritual, you don't have to spend a turn in anarchy. Plus, late in the game, it takes so doggone long to build your great dudes that designing your strategy around them seems iffy.
Thoughts?
Comment