Maybe I foster wars more often. As I said above, part of the task here is to make sure your potential enemies don't have turns and turns without conflict during which to amass huge numbers of troops as a result of the aggessive AI setting. Since getting them to fight each other on aggessive AI is often much easier than on normal AI, it's funny how that works.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is more difficult?
Collapse
X
-
It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
-
Although even here the AI screws up scattering his GGs across the empire instead of putting 3 or 4 in the same city for the promotions.No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
"I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostThat was one of the mods I actually wanted to try out.
What's the easiest way of keeping two copies seperate so you don't get the cheat message in mp? I've never known.
You can't play multiplayer with a mod unless every player has the exact same mod loaded - again you'll just be prompted to automatically unload the mod if you accidentally try to join an unmodded game with the mod loaded.
Sorry if I misunderstood your post and ranted on about stuff you know alreadyIt's a lowercase L, not an uppercase I.
Comment
-
No, I know none of that, and why I asked.
So it's not a hassle to keep reloaded an unloading a mod since I play MP a couple times a week.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blaupanzer View PostAlthough even here the AI screws up scattering his GGs across the empire instead of putting 3 or 4 in the same city for the promotions.
And another reason why I love checking into cities before razing option.
If the city has 4 GGs, I'm keeping it.It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
Originally posted by rah View PostNo, I know none of that, and why I asked.
So it's not a hassle to keep reloaded an unloading a mod since I play MP a couple times a week.It's a lowercase L, not an uppercase I.
Comment
-
I'll have to check that out, thanks. But if you're wrong, I'm coming back here and giving you some grieveIt's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
-
I had some issues in previous versions of BtS with switching back and forth between mods and the regular game. Someone said to keep a copy of the civcore.dll files handy in case you need to paste them over the modded ones when switching back.I'm consitently stupid- Japher
I think that opinion in the United States is decidedly different from the rest of the world because we have a free press -- by free, I mean a virgorously presented right wing point of view on the air and available to all.- Ned
Comment
-
What is "the average gamer" you guys keep mentioning? Like yer all the cream de la cream of super gamers . Hey just because I've played more Civ than I've slept in my lifetime I dont think myself special. Holier than thou I am not. I can beat the snot outta this game but stick me in a FPS and it's GnuB city.
Anywayz... Your all wrong. Agg AI makes the game EASIER not because of tech rates... but because of predictability. You know war is coming. thus you prepare for it, and win it. Playing non agg AI having that 100 strong SOD show up at your border when you were NOT expecting it is what makes things harder. Give us a "Random" choice on AGG AI!!! NOW!!! Just so you never know.--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh?...So with that said: if you can not read my post because of spelling, then who is really the stupid one?...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauptman View PostWhat is "the average gamer" you guys keep mentioning? Like yer all the cream de la cream of super gamers . Hey just because I've played more Civ than I've slept in my lifetime I dont think myself special. Holier than thou I am not.
When you're designing a game, one of your primary concerns is how the game plays to someone who opens the box the first time. New players are the lifeblood of a profitable game product. A newbie who enjoys it tells his buddies, and they buy it too, etc. A newbie also plays longer and grows the community. A player who joined the community will definitely buy the next one in the series.
The game designer also has to be concerned with many other issues, the above is just one of them.
So, if we're trying to interpret a game designers comments, we have to at least be aware of those issues, and also be aware of the fact that the designer has multiple, often competing, goals and issues he has to address.
Saying "average player" is shorthand for all that. Not that an "average" player even exists, let alone that any of us are a perfect match for that hypothetical person. All of us are different and have different things in mind when we try to figure out what we think is best for the game.
And, saying "average player" does not mean that the designers somehow "averaged" all the goals/issues and thus came to the perfect set of "average goals/issues" to design towards. I wish it was that simple.
Comment
-
We seem to have been using "average gamer" as a label for the semi-newbies/casual gamers who play occasionally and regard levels above noble as nonsense/not fun. We seem to think of ourselves as not so much the "elite" as the fanatic/dedicated fringe. Hauptman's claim of humility is rather cute, considering he also says : "I've played more Civ than I've slept in my lifetime., " indicating he is in fact young and highly dedicated. These are both good things but make his "you think you are elite" claim just a bit disingeneous.No matter where you go, there you are. - Buckaroo Banzai
"I played it [Civilization] for three months and then realised I hadn't done any work. In the end, I had to delete all the saved files and smash the CD." Iain Banks, author
Comment
-
i think i fall into that 'average' catgory. i have a tough time on noble and enjoy it.I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
[Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Blaupanzer View PostWe seem to have been using "average gamer" as a label for the semi-newbies/casual gamers who play occasionally and regard levels above noble as nonsense/not fun. We seem to think of ourselves as not so much the "elite" as the fanatic/dedicated fringe. Hauptman's claim of humility is rather cute, considering he also says : "I've played more Civ than I've slept in my lifetime., " indicating he is in fact young and highly dedicated. These are both good things but make his "you think you are elite" claim just a bit disingeneous.
Comment
Comment