I started playing marathon (1500 turn) games, and my first two wins were rather different and left me different feelings.
The first one I had a good start, made the right strategic decisions early and won a domination victory just before turn 800. In a sense I felt I had won too easy, so even though my score was a record for me, it didn't feel as satisfying.
The second one my starting location wasn't quite as good, made an iffy decision, but managed to grab a cultural victory before India launched their spaceship, around turn 1300. More work was involved in pulling off the win so it felt more satisfying even though the score was one of my lowest.
(I know the score is somewhat arbitrary, even for comparison purposes, but I included the note of their relative high and low merely as an indicator.)
So what type of wins to people prefer, the quick crushing defeats of all who oppose your rightful rule or the longer hard fought victory against opposition that put up a good fight?
The first one I had a good start, made the right strategic decisions early and won a domination victory just before turn 800. In a sense I felt I had won too easy, so even though my score was a record for me, it didn't feel as satisfying.
The second one my starting location wasn't quite as good, made an iffy decision, but managed to grab a cultural victory before India launched their spaceship, around turn 1300. More work was involved in pulling off the win so it felt more satisfying even though the score was one of my lowest.
(I know the score is somewhat arbitrary, even for comparison purposes, but I included the note of their relative high and low merely as an indicator.)
So what type of wins to people prefer, the quick crushing defeats of all who oppose your rightful rule or the longer hard fought victory against opposition that put up a good fight?
Comment