Originally posted by guermantes
This thread really shows the need for some kind of function in the civilopedia to add your own additional information to entries.
I understand it would need a supermeticulous job to actually complete the civilopedia and also write it in an unambiguous language (Jesus, some sentences meant to explain what something does can be read in 2-3 different ways!). And that they probably can't justify such an undertaking economically since we all can play the game pretty well anyhow. But these things *are* annoying.
Could we hope for that in CivV?
PS. Sometimes I am cynically wondering if the devs did not knowingly leave the civilopedia and the manual with apparent shortcomings they could have corrected, just to make people ask questions online and thus weld a community around the game. If so, it has worked pretty well.
This thread really shows the need for some kind of function in the civilopedia to add your own additional information to entries.
I understand it would need a supermeticulous job to actually complete the civilopedia and also write it in an unambiguous language (Jesus, some sentences meant to explain what something does can be read in 2-3 different ways!). And that they probably can't justify such an undertaking economically since we all can play the game pretty well anyhow. But these things *are* annoying.
Could we hope for that in CivV?
PS. Sometimes I am cynically wondering if the devs did not knowingly leave the civilopedia and the manual with apparent shortcomings they could have corrected, just to make people ask questions online and thus weld a community around the game. If so, it has worked pretty well.
If enough people think it's enough of an issue, then Solver and others would surely start fixing these things too.
Comment