Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Maginot lines

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Modo44

    Dude, a Maginot line implies multiple squares (i.e. a long border), and that's what I was referring to.
    That may have been what you had in mind, but it wasn't what you were referring to. From the quote you were replying to: "At least if there is a narrow piece of land you can cut off. "

    Those require a lot of units to hold effectively, and are nowhere near feasible.
    We're in agreement, then.

    Wodan

    Comment


    • #47
      Which would have been exactly the problem for the french, had they, as some plans had it, extended the line to the sea and built a second one in front of paris: There simply would have been not much left of the french army, had they have to man those lines.
      A fortress is supposed to save you troops - the way the maginot line was conceptionalized and used, it was rather a sponge that sucked up troops. It all became really absurd, when the french high command insisted on keeping up a 2.5 to 1 troop ratio against the germans at the Rhine, even after Guderian and Rommel had crossed the Meuse and thus pretty much by-passed it. Even then the french thought their biggest problem was to prevent the encirclement of the line, sending reserves, (tank forces to guard (!) forest trails !) there instead of to the somme...

      Comment


      • #48
        Interestingly enough, the Germans themselves used the "unbreakeable line" tactic quite much on both the Eastern and Western fronts when they were pushed backwards in 1944-45, probably because it costs more effort to kill a dug in unit than a mobile unit. It didn't stop the allies, but I surely believe the German generals had some thought behind it.
        So get your Naomi Klein books and move it or I'll seriously bash your faces in! - Supercitizen to stupid students
        Be kind to the nerdiest guy in school. He will be your boss when you've grown up!

        Comment


        • #49
          No, that was Hitler overulling the Generals.

          Originally posted by Chemical Ollie
          Interestingly enough, the Germans themselves used the "unbreakeable line" tactic quite much on both the Eastern and Western fronts when they were pushed backwards in 1944-45, probably because it costs more effort to kill a dug in unit than a mobile unit. It didn't stop the allies, but I surely believe the German generals had some thought behind it.
          1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
          Templar Science Minister
          AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

          Comment


          • #50
            correct, joncnumn (reading "lost victories" by Manstein right now )

            Comment

            Working...
            X