Playing vanilla Civ4 I experience that Prince is a bit too easy, I get a tech advantage in all cases, even if I make some minor wrong decisions. It's not hard to get back on top.
At monarch, it gets pretty hard to stay in the lead, I find I will allways lose the tech lead. In order to compete on Monarch, I can't afford to make much bad decisions. Now, the buildup I make is pretty much determined by what kind of recources I am presented with. i try to build cities at good spots, with strategic and economic recources, and notice that just creating settlers and workers and keep building cities isnt a winner like it was in civ3. I can't seem to figure out what exactly it is I'm doing wrong, just that focussing on cities isn't a winning strategy. I have to keep improving stuff, and buildup militairy to defend from bartbarians. The obvious answer would be: go back to Prince. But the fact is, I allways get the lead there, no matter what..
Can someone help out?
At monarch, it gets pretty hard to stay in the lead, I find I will allways lose the tech lead. In order to compete on Monarch, I can't afford to make much bad decisions. Now, the buildup I make is pretty much determined by what kind of recources I am presented with. i try to build cities at good spots, with strategic and economic recources, and notice that just creating settlers and workers and keep building cities isnt a winner like it was in civ3. I can't seem to figure out what exactly it is I'm doing wrong, just that focussing on cities isn't a winning strategy. I have to keep improving stuff, and buildup militairy to defend from bartbarians. The obvious answer would be: go back to Prince. But the fact is, I allways get the lead there, no matter what..
Can someone help out?
Comment