I have a question below but I describe the situation first:
I play noble, two continents maps on normal speed. I have only won space race and cultural victories so far since I am more the builder and have focused on building a solid empire.
But I wanted to try a more aggressive style and perhaps win a domination victory so I started as Shaka and promptly incorporated Hannibals cities as my own (my first early rush and quite proud of it!) and now I have taken the Ethiopian cities as well.
Darius is small in size and is my vassal (he applied for it himself) as he is stuck between me and Augustus Caesar.
I have made contact with the other continent where Gandhi, Mansa Musa & Pacal seem pretty happy with each other and Tokugawa is the smallest among them and angry with all.
I am well ahead in score and and my power and hammers are above the others as well. Augustus is 2nd in score and power though (he had very much open and free space to expand into). Everyone is pretty much levelled techwise.
We are just before turn 300 I think.
So my question is this. If I try to continue my warmongering and take on Augustus, will I not just wear my empire down and even if I beat him in the end the relative happiness on the other continent will make them come out ahead of me and win some other victory based on building?
If there was mayhem on their continent too then I could see how warmongering could be an option for me to win by but like this they will be super strong when I have beaten Augustus and stand ready for my subsequent naval invasion which will be crushed.
Do I need to play pangea maps in order to try to win by warmongering? Or should I play with 'always war' so that everyone else also is weakened by repetitious warfare?
(savegame attached if anyone wants to take a closer look at the situation)
I play noble, two continents maps on normal speed. I have only won space race and cultural victories so far since I am more the builder and have focused on building a solid empire.
But I wanted to try a more aggressive style and perhaps win a domination victory so I started as Shaka and promptly incorporated Hannibals cities as my own (my first early rush and quite proud of it!) and now I have taken the Ethiopian cities as well.
Darius is small in size and is my vassal (he applied for it himself) as he is stuck between me and Augustus Caesar.
I have made contact with the other continent where Gandhi, Mansa Musa & Pacal seem pretty happy with each other and Tokugawa is the smallest among them and angry with all.
I am well ahead in score and and my power and hammers are above the others as well. Augustus is 2nd in score and power though (he had very much open and free space to expand into). Everyone is pretty much levelled techwise.
We are just before turn 300 I think.
So my question is this. If I try to continue my warmongering and take on Augustus, will I not just wear my empire down and even if I beat him in the end the relative happiness on the other continent will make them come out ahead of me and win some other victory based on building?
If there was mayhem on their continent too then I could see how warmongering could be an option for me to win by but like this they will be super strong when I have beaten Augustus and stand ready for my subsequent naval invasion which will be crushed.
Do I need to play pangea maps in order to try to win by warmongering? Or should I play with 'always war' so that everyone else also is weakened by repetitious warfare?
(savegame attached if anyone wants to take a closer look at the situation)
Comment