Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will Civ4 run on a 486?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    There are a number of reasons why the requirements are what they are. Without knowing the exact compiler flags used, we can expect that Pentium was specified. Further, for all we know, MMX instructions may be used, which did not exist even in the original Pentium processor.

    Think about it, the "standard" instruction set we see in processors have been evolving, and in order to compete, Intel keeps adding new extensions. AMD did come up with 3DNow(which never really went anywhere), and of course the 64 bit extensions(which Intel not only copied but claimed as their own by putting a different name on them).

    So, we can expect that MMX may or may not be required, SSE(the original). I'm not sure if SSE 2 would have been required. AMD has SSE 2 and 3 at this point, but it's all about what Firaxis would have expected to be in processors.

    I will tell you this though, with a huge world and 17 AI civs on noble difficulty, it takes a while between worlds later on in the game on an Athlon 64 3200+(socket 754 ver, 2.2GHz) and 2 gigs of system memory. If you could handle waiting, and waiting, and waiting, I suppose it MIGHT work, but also keep in mind that Civ 4 had a target of Windows XP, and XP really really needs more system memory than almost every 486 system you could hope to put together.

    It would be easier to find a Pentium 4 1.6GHz machine that someone is throwing out than trying to get a 486 running Windows 98 to run the game properly without problems.

    Comment


    • #17
      How about 3.1.1?

      Comment


      • #18
        3.1.1 was da bomb!

        You guys remember when arguably one of the best games of its time, SimCity 2000 required 8 mbs of RAM (4 MB being like $120) and could be installed from two floppy disks? What barbaric times.
        May it come that all the Radiances will be known as ones own radiances

        Comment


        • #19
          No, I remember when we had 16k of RAM and liked it!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by DrSpike
            No, I remember when we had 16k of RAM and liked it!
            And a part of that 16k was taken up by the BASIC interpreter.

            Comment


            • #21
              And then the RAM pack fell off and you had 0k RAM.

              Comment


              • #22
                I feel old that peole don't know what a 486 is. Next thing you know, people still won't know what DOS is. I use DOS to surf the internet.

                I don't think I ever owned a 486 though. My first was a pentium 66 processor. I still miss Crusader: No Remorse, master of magic, and x-com.

                And no, civ4 won't run on it. I can get Windows XP on my mothers computer. She has a P700 with 512 MB of ram. I wouldn't dare try to put civ4 on that thing.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Dis
                  I use DOS to surf the internet.
                  I like to reminisce as much as the next man but why would you do that?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Qwertqwert


                    What browser do you use that can run on such weak computers but can actually use this site?
                    Lynx
                    Speaking of Erith:

                    "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Dis
                      I feel old that peole don't know what a 486 is. Next thing you know, people still won't know what DOS is. I use DOS to surf the internet.
                      Ever thought about upgrading ? Ok, it must be a joke.. but if it is not install some older linux distribution and enjoy multiple shells and lynx running on them.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by JulianD


                        Ever thought about upgrading ? Ok, it must be a joke.. but if it is not install some older linux distribution and enjoy multiple shells and lynx running on them.
                        People can still run X on an old Linux box with NCSA Mosaic if they wanted.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Dis
                          I feel old that peole don't know what a 486 is. Next thing you know, people still won't know what DOS is. I use DOS to surf the internet.

                          I don't think I ever owned a 486 though. My first was a pentium 66 processor. I still miss Crusader: No Remorse, master of magic, and x-com.

                          And no, civ4 won't run on it. I can get Windows XP on my mothers computer. She has a P700 with 512 MB of ram. I wouldn't dare try to put civ4 on that thing.

                          My 486 DX2-66 was my second motherboard in my first computer. I remember how awesomely fast it was doing the worldgen for Civ1.

                          The first incarnation was a barebones 12MHz 286, to which I added a 1:1 RLL controller to turn that ho-hum 40M Seagate 251 into a screamin' 65M speed-demon!


                          My brother got me Civ4 but I forgot my comp only has 256M and onboard video. Now I gotta find money for memory.
                          (\__/) Save a bunny, eat more Smurf!
                          (='.'=) Sponsored by the National Smurfmeat Council
                          (")_(") Smurf, the original blue meat! © 1999, patent pending, ® and ™ (except that "Smurf" bit)

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Solver
                            Sorry, but in the time spent on Apolyton, I must have developed some sort of spam intolerance disorder.
                            For all your intolerance you never seem to close some of the worst spam threads

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Like this one for instance?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Kuciwalker


                                For all your intolerance you never seem to close some of the worst spam threads
                                I am sure that you, as a model citizen, are reporting all cases of excessive spam .
                                Solver, WePlayCiv Co-Administrator
                                Contact: solver-at-weplayciv-dot-com
                                I can kill you whenever I please... but not today. - The Cigarette Smoking Man

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X