Hello everybody !
My question here is just about my empire management in the "middle" game. Here the situation :
I like to play on epic speed and prince level (still get screwed at monarch...). And I know I can win most of these games when warmongering. Depending upon the Civ I choose, I will attack sooner (romans etc...) or later (russians etc...), but nearly always have a consistent win.
BUT the question is about my empire management itself, if I want to be a builder rather than a neighbours-burner.
In my current game as Gandhi for example, my start was temendous, I have been able to create four religions, and most early wonders (Stonehenge, Pyramids, Oracle, Great Lighthouse, Colossus, Sistine Chapel, and I forget a few ones). so, around 500 AD or so, I had much advance in technology on everyone else, and 1,5 x more points. But from this moment, having tried to keep on building (rather than warmongering) for once, I realized that on about 1700AD, I was only one tech ahead of my neighbours, and not so great in points (although I had by far the biggest land area and cities, and my science rate has NEVER got under 80%).
I agree that, being much stronger than them, most AIs did not want to trade sciences with me (and the only ones sharing my religion were japanese and greeks, awful partners), but I supposed that with such a consistent start, I would roll on everybody else on science.
I have been first to all later techs that award a benefit (free tech, free merchant etc ...), but not consistelntly.
I think the moment I start to lose some ground is the Renaissance. Has any one a few ideas about what to do there, aside from waging wars after wars ?
Best regards,
Vinnnch
My question here is just about my empire management in the "middle" game. Here the situation :
I like to play on epic speed and prince level (still get screwed at monarch...). And I know I can win most of these games when warmongering. Depending upon the Civ I choose, I will attack sooner (romans etc...) or later (russians etc...), but nearly always have a consistent win.
BUT the question is about my empire management itself, if I want to be a builder rather than a neighbours-burner.
In my current game as Gandhi for example, my start was temendous, I have been able to create four religions, and most early wonders (Stonehenge, Pyramids, Oracle, Great Lighthouse, Colossus, Sistine Chapel, and I forget a few ones). so, around 500 AD or so, I had much advance in technology on everyone else, and 1,5 x more points. But from this moment, having tried to keep on building (rather than warmongering) for once, I realized that on about 1700AD, I was only one tech ahead of my neighbours, and not so great in points (although I had by far the biggest land area and cities, and my science rate has NEVER got under 80%).
I agree that, being much stronger than them, most AIs did not want to trade sciences with me (and the only ones sharing my religion were japanese and greeks, awful partners), but I supposed that with such a consistent start, I would roll on everybody else on science.
I have been first to all later techs that award a benefit (free tech, free merchant etc ...), but not consistelntly.
I think the moment I start to lose some ground is the Renaissance. Has any one a few ideas about what to do there, aside from waging wars after wars ?
Best regards,
Vinnnch
Comment