Wouldn´t it be great if the civ that builds the Manhatten project would get an atomic bomb/Enola Gay style bomber when finished? It would closer resemble history, and could, as a special feature, force an enemy at war with you to offer peace. What do you think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Manhatten project should grant atomic bomb
Collapse
X
-
No.
Once the Manhattan Project had been completed the US still needed to construct the bombs.(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
-
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
No.
Once the Manhattan Project had been completed the US still needed to construct the bombs.
We're playing a game where archers have a chance to beat tanks.
Nothing that we can dream up is really out of the question.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amickiew
You're certainly not playing the realism card are you?
We're playing a game where archers have a chance to beat tanks.
Nothing that we can dream up is really out of the question.
I find it really frustrating that once one civ completes the Manhatten Project, all civ's can build nukes!
They should at least have to build the internet
However having any AI you are at war with having to sue for peace once you complete the Manhatten Project is not a bad idea.I don't know why he saved my life. Maybe in those last moments he loved life more than he ever had before. Not just his life - anybody's life, my life. All he'd wanted were the same answers the rest of us want. Where did I come from? Where am I going? How long have I got? All I could do was sit there and watch him die.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Amickiew
We're playing a game where archers have a chance to beat tanks.
Comment
-
Personally I'd like to see the nuclear option fleshed out a bit more, if only for fun. Complete the strategic triad (subs, bombers, and missiles) that helped keep the world out of world war III. That's probably going deeper than the devs want to take it though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
No.
Once the Manhattan Project had been completed the US still needed to construct the bombs.
You really should think before knocking down someone's idea.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grenouille
As far as I know, the Manhatten project provided the USA with 3 nuclear bombs. The first was used for testing at Los Alamos, the other two were used against Japan. Or am I mistaken?
Anyway, it wouldn't be a bad idea for the manhatten project to make a small atomic bomb for the player. If nothing else, it'd be one way for the hammers you spent on it to be worthwhile, instead of just letting someone else build it.
I don't know about forcing an enemy to offer you peace, though. Japan was already effectivly defeated before we dropped the bomb. If the situation was different (say, Germany had conquored all of Europe and then we dropped the bomb on them), I'm not sure it would have forced a surrender quite as easily.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -SafaN-
well there is a chance an arrow will come in the big gun of a tank, and then the tank will explode upon shooting ..."I'm a guy - I take everything seriously except other people's emotions"
"Never play cards with any man named 'Doc'. Never eat at any place called 'Mom's'. And never, ever...sleep with anyone whose troubles are worse than your own." - Nelson Algren
"A single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic." - Joseph Stalin (attr.)
Comment
Comment