It really is up to each player what they think the best are, which shows that they did a good job balancing them, though Financial is usaually high on the lists and expansive usaually low.
Here's mine
1. Financial
2. Industrious
3. (Tied) Agressive
3. (Tied) Creative
5. Philosophical
6. (Tied) Organized
6. (Tied) Expansive
6. (Tied) Spiratual
The reason why is because with the +50% your chances of getting the wonders in insanely increased, espically if you have a tech lead, which is easy if you have Financial (which is why I usaually choose Qin Shi Huang) Agressive is a nessissity for a warmonger. Creative is more like Expansive then Expansive is. Phisosophical is just an odd one I think, it's not really bad, but I like those others better. But if there was an Industrious/Philosophical leader I'd definatly go with them. And Organized, Expansive and Spiratual are just not that good. Organized isn't useful until late in the game when I can afford to the extra, Expansive just isn't any good, and I don't switch civics very often, I NEVER have more then 8 anarchy turns oh Epic.
Here's mine
1. Financial
2. Industrious
3. (Tied) Agressive
3. (Tied) Creative
5. Philosophical
6. (Tied) Organized
6. (Tied) Expansive
6. (Tied) Spiratual
The reason why is because with the +50% your chances of getting the wonders in insanely increased, espically if you have a tech lead, which is easy if you have Financial (which is why I usaually choose Qin Shi Huang) Agressive is a nessissity for a warmonger. Creative is more like Expansive then Expansive is. Phisosophical is just an odd one I think, it's not really bad, but I like those others better. But if there was an Industrious/Philosophical leader I'd definatly go with them. And Organized, Expansive and Spiratual are just not that good. Organized isn't useful until late in the game when I can afford to the extra, Expansive just isn't any good, and I don't switch civics very often, I NEVER have more then 8 anarchy turns oh Epic.
Comment